aternal Internal Sphincterotomy versus Manual Anal Dilatation in Chronic Anal Fissure
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K602- Anal fissure, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: K601- Chronic anal fissure
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/10/046651
- Lead Sponsor
- Pondicherry Institute of medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1) Patients with Chronic Anal Fissure( >= 6 weeks of duration)
2) Age 20-60years.
3) Failed conservative management. (Not responded to conservative management of chronic anal fissure for >= 6weeks)
Exclusion Criteria
1) Patients with Chronic Anal Fissure( >= 6 weeks of duration)
2) Age 20-60years.
3) Failed conservative management. (Not responded to conservative management of chronic anal fissure for >= 6weeks)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine post operative pain and incontinence in subjects with Chronic Anal Fissure undergoing Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy compared with Manual Anal Dilatation. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 24 hours after surgery, at the time of discharge, 1st month, 2nd month and 3rd month <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the rate of ulcer healing in Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy compared with Manual Anal Dilatation in subjects with Chronic Anal Fissure.Timepoint: 24 hours after surgery, at the time of discharge, 1st month, 2nd month and 3rd month