Estudio Coste-Efectividad "Snapshot" Nacional de Costes robótica vs laparoscópica
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 180
- 主要终点
- Cost Effectiveness
研究概览
简要总结
this is a prospective no randomized study of cost effectiveness of laparoscopic vs robotic study of Distal pancreatectomy, Hernioplasty for inguinal hernia and Rectal resection
详细描述
Robotic is having increased interest in the last decade and on of its limits is the cost.
From previous report Robotic surgery entails higher costs. However, cost solely is not enough to validate a new procedure. Whenever a new technology is introduced it is important to evaluate cost and improved quality of life as well, which is the Cost Effectiveness (CE) study.
The aim of our study is to evaluate in Spain the CE of laparoscopic and robotic procedure of Distal Pancreatectomy, Gastrectomy, Nissen procedure, Rectal resection and Inguinal hernia repair.
This is a prospective snapshot study during 6 months in which patients are included from several Spanish centers. Cost are defined according to the spain official cost data recorded from the RECH (https://www.rechosp.org).
Main clinical outcomes are gathered divided in intra operative and post operative data.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Elective surgery with indication of distal Pancreatectomy , Gastrectomy, Hernioplasty, Rectal resection and Nissen performed by laparoscopy or robotic
- •>18 years old
排除标准
- •Patients who do not want to participate
- •Previous abdominal surgeries
结局指标
主要结局
Cost Effectiveness
时间窗: 90 days
This is the increased cost differences of the new technology to improve the quality of life after the intervention
次要结局
未报告次要终点