Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03392532
NCT03392532CompletedNot Applicable

Axis Orientation Comparison of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Contact Lenses

Alcon Research1 site in 1 country36 target enrollmentStarted: January 4, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
36
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Lenses With Axis Orientation Within ±30 Degrees From the 90 Degree Axis (Ideal Location)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare the performance of two different types of Alcon soft toric study contact lenses to obtain information on study lens orientation.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Successful wear of soft contact lenses for vision correction in both eyes during the past 3 months for a minimum of 3 days per week and 8 hours per day
  • •Astigmatism
  • •Requires contact lenses
  • •Best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye
  • •Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Any eye condition that contraindicates contact lens wear, as determined by the Investigator
  • •Any eye surgery that contraindicates contact lens wear, as determined by the Investigator
  • •Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply

Arms & Interventions

AOHG toric, then AO toric

Other

Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE, followed by lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses, as randomized. Each product worn in both eyes for approximately 30 minutes, with a 30-45 minute washout between the removal of Pair 1 and insertion of Pair 2.

Intervention: Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE (Device)

AOHG toric, then AO toric

Other

Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE, followed by lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses, as randomized. Each product worn in both eyes for approximately 30 minutes, with a 30-45 minute washout between the removal of Pair 1 and insertion of Pair 2.

Intervention: Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses (Device)

AO toric, then AOHG toric

Other

Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses, followed by lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE, as randomized. Each product worn in both eyes for approximately 30 minutes, with a 30-45 minute washout between the removal of Pair 1 and insertion of Pair 2.

Intervention: Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE (Device)

AO toric, then AOHG toric

Other

Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses, followed by lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses with HYDRAGLYDE, as randomized. Each product worn in both eyes for approximately 30 minutes, with a 30-45 minute washout between the removal of Pair 1 and insertion of Pair 2.

Intervention: Lotrafilcon B toric contact lenses (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Lenses With Axis Orientation Within ±30 Degrees From the 90 Degree Axis (Ideal Location)

Time Frame: Day 1, 10 minutes after lens insertion, each product

Each lens was classified based on whether the absolute difference between the axis location and 90° was less than or equal to 30° (ie, lens axis located between the 60° and 120° axis inclusive). Inferential testing was not planned for this primary effectiveness endpoint.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials