The Effect of Motor Relearning Program on Functional Mobility in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Stroke; Chronic Stroke Patients; Chronic Stroke Survivors; Hemiplegia

• Registration Number: NCT06690073
• Lead Sponsor: University of Jazan

Brief Summary

1. To find out the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy on improving functional mobility of lower extremity among chronic hemiplegic subjects.

2. To find out the effcctiveness of motor relearning program along with conventional physical therapy treatment on improving functional mobility of lower extremity among chronic hemiplegic subjects.

3. To find out the effectiveness of motor relearning program along with conventional physical therapy treatment over conventional physical therapy on improving functional mobility of lower extremity among chronic hemiplegic subjects.

Detailed Description

After a careful monitor of inclusion and exclusion criteria and obtaining the institutional review board approval, the study was conducted by convenience sampling to select the suitable subjects, explaining the procedure to them, and got the written \& oral informed consent. The study included two groups, each with 16 participants, which were allocated randomly to the control and experimental groups by lottery method. CPT was administered to the control group three times per week for six weeks (45 minutes per session). CPT treatments such as mat activities, assisted movements, weight-bearing strategies, and gymnasium training were given to the control group. At the same time, the experimental group received the previously mentioned CPT treatment as well as MRP for sitting to standing for six weeks, for a total duration of 45 minutes per session (30 minutes of CPT treatment followed by 15 minutes MRP), three sessions per week.

MRP of sitting and standing activities: The physical therapist was standing in front of the participant, who was sitting in an armrest-equipped chair. Participants were initially taught to keep their feet back, followed by forward trunk positioning. The physical therapist then aided the activity by holding the involved side of the hand and shoulder, where the subject had informed to execute anterior trunk bending more quickly, if the participant did not do it well or performed it in an abnormal manner. Finally, participants were instructed to press down through the affected foot, stand up as quickly as possible, and bring their hips anterior. The physical therapist suggested pressing down through the participant's knee along the shaft of the leg while moving it anteriorly through the affected foot.

MRP of standing to sitting: The participant was on his feet. The physiotherapist assisted the participant with anterior shoulder movement and knee bending at the start of the stand-to-sit movement. The physiotherapist then assisted the participant in keeping his weight on the affected leg while sitting. The subject progressed by standing and sitting with different seat heights, stopping in different parts of the range of motion, and varying speed. These variations in time and space were directed by the physical therapist. The number of reps and intensity of the exercise were classified according to the subject's capacity level and gradually increased as they improved. Subjects were given verbal feedback on weight distribution, performance speed, and encouragement.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2024-11
• Study Start: 2024-11-04
• Study First Submitted: 2024-11-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-11-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-11-12
• Study First Posted: 2024-11-15
• Last Update Posted: 2024-11-15
• Primary Completion: 2025-04-30
• Study Completion: 2025-06-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 32

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Barthel Index (BI)	week 0 and week 6	The Barthel index, frequently used for stroke, gauges the level of help needed by an individual for ten mobility and daily living tasks. The total of all weighted individual item scores is converted into a single overall score, which ranges from 0 to 100. Consequently, "0" represents total independence from all ten activities. It takes 5 to 10 minutes to complete, has strong validity and reliability, and has minimal sensitivity for high-level functioning (Bhalerao et al., 2011).
Motor Assessment Scale (MAS)	week 0 and week 6	MAS is used to evaluate motor skills. MAS records eight functional activities: rolling in bed, sitting, sit to stand, walking, balancing in seated position, upper arm, hand, and wrist activities. The general tone of the body is noted in the ninth item. The scale for each item is 0 to 6. Hence, a score of 0 to 54 (normal function). According to WHO guidelines, MAS is supposed to be tested on the severity of disabilities. The MAS was highly dependable, with an average inter-rater reliability of .95 and an average test-retest reliability of 0.98 (Bhalerao et al., 2011).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

King Saud Medical City; 🇸🇦 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia