Applied Forces During Neonatal Intubation at Different Heights of the Resuscitation Table
- Conditions
- Neonatal DiseaseIntubation
- Interventions
- Device: Direct laryngoscope and table at xiphoid levelDevice: Videolaryngoscope and table at xiphoid levelDevice: Direct laryngoscope and table at umbilical levelDevice: Videolaryngoscope and table at umbilical level
- Registration Number
- NCT06474572
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital Padova
- Brief Summary
The study aims to compare the applied forces during intubation of a newborn manikin with direct and video laryngoscope at different heights of the resuscitation table. Furthermore, the success at the first attempt, the intubation time and participants' opinion on the procedures were investigated.
This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover trial on the applied forces during intubation of a newborn manikin with direct and video laryngoscope at different heights of the resuscitation table.
- Detailed Description
Background: Endotracheal intubation is an important life-saving procedure for critically ill neonates. Some procedure-related aspects may affect the quality of the intubation. Optimizing the relative height between patient and operator may improve intubation procedures.
Objectives: To compare the applied forces during intubation of a newborn manikin with direct and video laryngoscope at different heights of the resuscitation table. Furthermore, the success at the first attempt, the intubation time, and participants' opinions on the procedures were investigated.
Methods: This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover trial on the applied forces during intubation of a newborn manikin with direct and video laryngoscope at different heights of the resuscitation table. Participants will be Level III NICU/PICU consultants, and pediatric residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the forces applied on the neonatal manikin during the intubation. The secondary outcome measures will be the success of the first attempt, the total time of intubation, and participants' opinions about the procedure.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
- Level III NICU and PICU consultants, and pediatric residents
- Refusal to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Direct laryngoscope and table at xiphoid level Direct laryngoscope and table at xiphoid level Participants will be required to intubate the manikin with a direct laryngoscope and table at xiphoid level Videolaryngoscope and table at xiphoid level Videolaryngoscope and table at xiphoid level Participants will be required to intubate the manikin with a video laryngoscope and table at xiphoid level Direct laryngoscope and table at umbilical level Direct laryngoscope and table at umbilical level Participants will be required to intubate the manikin with a direct laryngoscope and table at umbilical level Videolaryngoscope and table at umbilical level Videolaryngoscope and table at umbilical level Participants will be required to intubate the manikin with a video laryngoscope and table at umbilical level
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Magnitide of applied forces (Newton) 3 minutes Magnitude of forces (measured in Newton) applied to the epiglottis and the palate of the neonatal manikin during the intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of participants achieving the intubation success at the first attempt 30 seconds The success of the first attempt will be defined as the achievement of the correct positioning of the endotracheal tube in the trachea as assessed by the external observer
Total time of intubation 3 minutes Time of device positioning will be calculated as the sum of the time of device positioning in all attempts, as the procedure will be repeated in case of incorrect positioning
Participant's opinions about the procedure 12 hours Participants will report: their preference about table height and device; perceived difficulty using a Likert scale (1= not difficult, 5=very difficult)