NCT01210092
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine
ConditionsTracheal Intubation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tracheal Intubation
- Sponsor
- University of Cologne
- Enrollment
- 25
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- successful tracheal intubation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 14 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To determine whether different video laryngoscopes facilitate intubation in an manikin with immobilized cervical spine compared with standard laryngoscopy.
Investigators
J. Hinkelbein
PD Dr. med.
University of Cologne
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •anaesthesiologist
- •experienced in tracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- •missing experience in tracheal intubation
- •missing informed consent
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
successful tracheal intubation
Time Frame: max 5 minutes
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Ice-pick Intubation With Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Restricted Access to the AirwayTracheal IntubationNCT01210105University of Cologne25
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the Videolaryngoscopes With Manual In-line StabilizationOral SurgeryMaxillofacial SurgeryNCT02647606Ajou University School of Medicine120
Completed
Phase 4
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to IntubateIntubation, EndotrachealNCT00178555The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston200
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Routine Endotracheal Intubation With McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScopeIntubationNCT02997488Ajou University School of Medicine140
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.ImmobilizationNCT01032460University College Hospital Galway90