Muscle Energy Technique Versus Strain Counterstrain for Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Physical Therapy
• Interventions: Procedure: The physical therapy program; Procedure: Muscle energy technique combined with the physical therapy program.; Procedure: Strain counterstrain technique combined with the physical therapy program

• Registration Number: NCT05925205
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted to examine the superiority of effectiveness between muscle energy technique combined with physical therapy, strain counterstrain combined with physical therapy, and physical therapy alone in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, cervical lateral flexion and rotation range of motion, and neck function for patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.

Detailed Description

Myofascial pain syndrome represents a common, overlooked, and under-diagnosed disorder that have very critical negative effects on people's lives. In addition, it overloads the societies and causes several burdens on healthcare systems. However, this disorder is usually dismissed by many clinicians keeping the patients in pain for long periods. The central feature of myofascial pain syndrome is the myofascial trigger points that when managed properly, the painful symptoms disappear. Muscle energy technique and strain counterstrain immediate effects were compared in a recent comparative study for patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and neck mobility. The results showed that there were improvements of both techniques with no significant differences between them. Regarding the evidence of the two techniques; muscle energy technique and strain counterstrain in the management of patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points, there is lack of high-quality evidence investigating the effectiveness and safety of both techniques for this population and there is a need for well-developed randomized controlled trial to take a step in the pyramid of levels of evidence for the use and applicability of them. After reviewing the available literature, it was found that there is no study directly combined both techniques with physical therapy protocol in a randomized clinical trial for patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points; this will enable us to compare the effects of them in a controlled design to examine and find out the differences between the three treatment protocols.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2023-05-07
• Status Verified: 2023-06
• Study First Submitted: 2023-06-21
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-06-21
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-06-21
• Study First Posted: 2023-06-29
• Last Update Posted: 2023-06-29
• Primary Completion: 2024-05-07
• Study Completion: 2024-12-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 54

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Group C	The physical therapy program	Experimental group 3.
Group A	Muscle energy technique combined with the physical therapy program.	Experimental group 1.
Group B	Strain counterstrain technique combined with the physical therapy program	Experimental group 2.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in cervical right rotation range of motion.	Change from Baseline cervical right rotation range of motion at one month.	Measurement of cervical right rotation range of motion using the cervical range of motion device.
Change in neck function.	Change from Baseline neck function at one month.	Measurement of neck function using the neck disability index-Arabic version.
Change in the right side pain pressure threshold.	Change from Baseline right side pain pressure threshold at one month.	Measurement of right side pain pressure threshold using the pressure algometer.
Change in cervical flexion range of motion.	Change from Baseline cervical flexion range of motion at one month.	Measurement of cervical flexion range of motion using the cervical range of motion device.
Change in cervical extension range of motion.	Change from Baseline cervical extension range of motion at one month.	Measurement of cervical extension range of motion using the cervical range of motion device.
Change in pain intensity.	Change from Baseline pain intensity at one month.	Measurement of pain intensity using the visual analogue scale.
Change in cervical left lateral flexion range of motion.	Change from Baseline cervical left lateral flexion range of motion at one month.	Measurement of cervical left lateral flexion range of motion using the cervical range of motion device.
Change in cervical left rotation range of motion.	Change from Baseline cervical left rotation range of motion at one month.	Measurement of cervical left rotation range of motion using the cervical range of motion device.
Change in the left side pain pressure threshold.	Change from Baseline left side pain pressure threshold at one month.	Measurement of left side pain pressure threshold using the pressure algometer.
Change in cervical right lateral flexion range of motion.	Change from Baseline cervical right lateral flexion range of motion at one month.	Measurement of cervical right lateral flexion range of motion using the cervical range of motion device.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Outpatient Clinics, Faculty of Physical Therapy Kafrelsheikh University; 🇪🇬 Kafr Ash Shaykh, Egypt