Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01249976
NCT01249976
Completed
Not Applicable

Evaluation of Recent Techniques for Diagnosing Central Venous Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Children

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris1 site in 1 country148 target enrollmentFebruary 1, 2009

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Enrollment
148
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
the differential time to positivity
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Removal of a central venous catheter (CVC) is often useful to prove its responsibility in a bloodstream infection. To avoid unnecessary removal of CVC, some catheter-spearing diagnostic methods have been recently developed. The aim of the study is to evaluate three catheter-spearing diagnostic methods in critically ill children: 1) the measurement of the differential time to positivity between a blood culture drawn from a peripherical vein and another one drawn through the CVC; 2) the exam of a blood sample drawn for the CVC and stained by acridine orange leucocyte cytospin test; 3) the semi-quantitative skin culture of the area around the insertion site of the CVC.

Detailed Description

Samples for the three techniques described above will be collected from the children admitted in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit with a CVC for more than 48 hours and with clinical or biological signs of systemic infection. Any investigation required to determine the origin of the infection will be performed, according to physician's judgement. If the CVC is removed or changed on a guide wire, a quantitative culture of the distal segment will be performed. All the patients with a bloodstream infection and sampled according to the protocol will be included for statistical analysis. The physician and an independent medical expert will analyse if the bloodstream infection is CVC-related or not, according to the reference standard, by analysis of the clinical and bacteriological data, blinded towards the three studied techniques. The most optimal threshold will be determined and the sensibility, the specificity, the positive and negative predictable value of the three techniques will be calculated. Then sensibility of these three techniques will be compared.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 1, 2009
End Date
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
5 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • age between 0 and 18 years.
  • Presence of a Central Venous Catheter for more than 48h (excepted umbilical catheter or peripherally inserted central catheters)
  • Presence of at least one clinical or biological sign of systemic infection
  • Parents are informed of the protocol and don't refuse the inclusion
  • Prior inclusion in this study for the same bloodstream infection

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

the differential time to positivity

Time Frame: maximum 24 hours

To determine the sensibility, the specificity, the positive and negative predictible value of the measurement of the differential time to positivity between a blood culture drawn from a peripherical vein and another one drawn through the CVC, compared to the reference standard

Secondary Outcomes

  • acridine orange leucocyte cytospin test.(maximun 24 hours)
  • semi-quantitative skin culture(maximum 24 hours)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials