Clinical Effects of Intermitent Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Interventions
- Device: Flash
- Registration Number
- NCT05095610
- Lead Sponsor
- Castilla-La Mancha Health Service
- Brief Summary
Observational cross-sectional multicenter study about clinical effect of intermitent continuous glucose monitoring (Flash) in adult type 1 diabetes patients in an Spanish public health system.
- Detailed Description
Observational cross-sectional multicenter study about clinical effect of intermitent continuous glucose monitoring (Flash) in adult type 1 diabetes patients in an Spanish public health system.
All clinical variables are gathered from chart review. Data analysis is conducted using SPSS statistic software. Results are presented as mean +/- SD values. A paired Student´s t-test or Wilconxon signed test were used fr the analysis differences. Comparison between proportions were analyzed using a chi-square test. A P value \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The protocolo was apporved by the reference Castilla-La Mancha Public Health Service Ethic Commitee. All participants provided written consent.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1121
- Presence of Type 1 diabetes.
- Age >18 years.
- Patients previously followed in the DIACAM study.
- Any other kinds of diabetes.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Adult Type 1 Diabetes Flash All adult patients with type 1 diabetes previously followed in the DIACAM study (see bellow reference). Sastre J, Pinés PJ, Moreno J, Aguirre M, Blanco B, Calderón D, Herranz S, Roa C, Lopez J; Grupo de estudio DIACAM 1. Metabolic control and treatment patterns in patients with type 1 diabetes in Castilla-La Mancha: the DIAbetes tipo 1 in Castilla La Mancha study. Endocrinol Nutr. 2012 Nov;59(9):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2012.07.003.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HbA1c difference 1 year Difference in HbA1c before initiating iCGM compared with HbA1c levels after one year of treatment.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Insulin dose 1 year Daily insulin dose requirements (UI/Kg/d)
TBR 1 year Time bellow range (TBR, \<3.9 mmol/L) of the interstitial glucose
TAR 1 year Time above range (TAR, \>10 mmol/L) of the interstitial glucose
%CV 1 year Percentage of the variation coefficient (%, \>36% is considered high levels)
Body weight 1 year Total corporal body weight (Kg)
Frequency of SBGM 1 year Daily number of blood capilary test fot glycemia determination.
TIR 1 year Time in range (TIR, 3.9-10 mmol/L) of the interstitial glucose
Adherence to Flash 1 year Time of use of Flash glucose monitoring (% possible time of use)
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
Santa Barbara Hospital
🇪🇸Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain
Virgen del Prado Hospital
🇪🇸Talavera De La Reina, Toledo, Spain
Albacete University Hospital
🇪🇸Albacete, Spain
Obispo Rafael Torija, St.
🇪🇸Ciudad Real, Spain
Guadalajara University Hospital
🇪🇸Guadalajara, Spain
Toledo University Hospital
🇪🇸Toledo, Spain
La Mancha- Centro Hospital
🇪🇸Alcázar De San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain
Virgen de Altagracia Hospital
🇪🇸Valdepeñas, Ciudad Real, Spain