MedPath

Effectiveness of PEMF in Patients With Chronic Radicular Pain Due to Lomber Disc Herniation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Interventions
Device: PEMF
Device: TENS
Device: Hot pack
Device: Sham PEMF
Registration Number
NCT04049812
Lead Sponsor
Birkan Sonel Tur
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of pulse magnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation.

Detailed Description

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) is a non-invasive, painless treatment for various injuries, bone related conditions and pains. However, further studies on PEMF effects on low back and radicular pain is needed due to lack of studies in this area.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18-65
  • Unilateral radicular pain for at least 3 months
  • Severity of radicular pain with Visual Analog Score of at least 4/10
  • Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Cardiac pacemaker, or any metal implants or electronic devices anywhere in the body
  • History of surgery or algological procedure of the lumbar region
  • Physical therapy within the last year due to back pain
  • Previous PEMF treatment
  • Malignancy or suspicion
  • Polyneuropathy (diabetic or other)
  • Connective tissue disease
  • Presence of inflammatory joint pain
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Presence of open surface wound
  • Tuberculosis, mycosis, or viral disease
  • Presence of pain in another region of the body with higher severity than radicular back pain
  • Use of drugs other than paracetamol-derivative simple analgesics (Nonsteroidal Aanti inflammatuar, central effective, or narcotic analgesics), or less than three weeks since the discontinuation of these drugs
  • Advanced mood disorder
  • Radiographic evidence of Grade 2 spondylolisthesis, presence of spinal instability, and advanced degenerative spondylarthrosis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sham PEMF treatment GroupTENSGroup received routine hot pack, TENS and sham PEMF treatment.
Sham PEMF treatment GroupSham PEMFGroup received routine hot pack, TENS and sham PEMF treatment.
Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment GroupTENSGroup received routine hot pack, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and PEMF treatment.
Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment GroupHot packGroup received routine hot pack, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and PEMF treatment.
Sham PEMF treatment GroupHot packGroup received routine hot pack, TENS and sham PEMF treatment.
Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment GroupPEMFGroup received routine hot pack, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and PEMF treatment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
10 cm Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)one month after treatment

The patient is asked to indicate their perceived pain intensity along a 10 cm horizontal line, where '0' represents 'no pain' and '10', 'unbearable pain'.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)One month after treatment

Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) is a questionnaire designed to measure a patient's view of their own health status, in a number of areas.

The NHP consists of two parts. The first part focuses on health and comprises 38 items which deal with pain, energy, sleep, mobility, emotional reaction and social isolation.All questions have only yes/no answer options and each section score is weighted. The higher the score, the greater the number and severity of problems. The highest score in any section is 100.

Disability; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)One month after treatment

RMDQ has 24 yes/no questions. Scoring is between 0-24. A score of 0: no disability, score of \>1 indicates disability.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath