MedPath

Oral Morphine Versus Ketamine in Pain Management

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Pain, Procedural
Interventions
Drug: GROUP A
Drug: GROUP B
Registration Number
NCT05163366
Lead Sponsor
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Brief Summary

The study will mainly focus on procedural pain management using oral morphine versus rectal ketamine during paediatric burn and wound dressing at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.

Detailed Description

Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups A and B. Guardians of patients who are scheduled for burn wound care will sign written consent pre- operatively about procedural pain management. Group A will receive rectal ketamine while those in Group B will receive only traditional standard of care protocols.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
44
Inclusion Criteria
  • Pediatric patients between 6 months and 6-years old scheduled for a minimum of one procedure for burn wound dressing at the pediatric unit at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children with rectal or anal pathology,
  • Refusal to assent to participate or parental or guardian refusal to consent in the study
  • Children who require mechanical ventilation or already intubated in Intensive care unit
  • Those allergic to Ketamine or its constituents

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
GROUP AGROUP AGroup A will receive rectal ketamine(Ket)
GROUP BGROUP BGroup B will receive only traditional standard of care protocols.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
DIFFERENCE IN THE INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EFFECTS IN ORAL MORPHINE VERSUS KETAMINE ARM4 hours

Secondary endpoint will be the difference in the incidence of adverse effects a cross arms obtained from patient, nurse, and chart for DAIDS Adverse Event Grading Table 2014.

PAIN SCORES ON ORAL MORPHINE VERSUS KETAMINE ARM4 hours

The primary endpoint will be difference in pain scores on a Revised FLACC(Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in the two arms.The primary endpoint will be difference in pain scores on a Revised FLACC(Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in the two arms. Each category is scored on the 0-2 scale, which results in a total score of 0-10. 0: Relaxed and comfortable, 1-3 : Mild discomfort ,4-6 : Moderate pain, 7-10 : Severe discomfort or pain or both

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¬

Mbarara, Uganda

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath