Oral Morphine Versus Ketamine in Pain Management
- Conditions
- Pain, Procedural
- Interventions
- Drug: GROUP ADrug: GROUP B
- Registration Number
- NCT05163366
- Lead Sponsor
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology
- Brief Summary
The study will mainly focus on procedural pain management using oral morphine versus rectal ketamine during paediatric burn and wound dressing at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.
- Detailed Description
Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups A and B. Guardians of patients who are scheduled for burn wound care will sign written consent pre- operatively about procedural pain management. Group A will receive rectal ketamine while those in Group B will receive only traditional standard of care protocols.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
- Pediatric patients between 6 months and 6-years old scheduled for a minimum of one procedure for burn wound dressing at the pediatric unit at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital
- Children with rectal or anal pathology,
- Refusal to assent to participate or parental or guardian refusal to consent in the study
- Children who require mechanical ventilation or already intubated in Intensive care unit
- Those allergic to Ketamine or its constituents
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description GROUP A GROUP A Group A will receive rectal ketamine(Ket) GROUP B GROUP B Group B will receive only traditional standard of care protocols.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method DIFFERENCE IN THE INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EFFECTS IN ORAL MORPHINE VERSUS KETAMINE ARM 4 hours Secondary endpoint will be the difference in the incidence of adverse effects a cross arms obtained from patient, nurse, and chart for DAIDS Adverse Event Grading Table 2014.
PAIN SCORES ON ORAL MORPHINE VERSUS KETAMINE ARM 4 hours The primary endpoint will be difference in pain scores on a Revised FLACC(Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in the two arms.The primary endpoint will be difference in pain scores on a Revised FLACC(Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in the two arms. Each category is scored on the 0-2 scale, which results in a total score of 0-10. 0: Relaxed and comfortable, 1-3 : Mild discomfort ,4-6 : Moderate pain, 7-10 : Severe discomfort or pain or both
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital
πΊπ¬Mbarara, Uganda