10-day Decitabine Versus Conventional Chemotherapy ("3+7") Followed by Allografting in AML Patients ≥ 60 Years: a Randomized Phase III Study of the EORTC Leukemia Group, CELG, GIMEMA and German MDS Study Group
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 606
- 试验地点
- 53
- 主要终点
- Overall survival (OS)
研究概览
简要总结
Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a small (< 10%) chance of long-term survival. Despite the treatment of elderly AML patients with intensive chemotherapy, the survival has not been improved during the last decades.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether frontline therapy with a 10-day decitabine schedule provides a better survival than standard intensive combination chemotherapy in elderly AML patients (>= 60 years).
详细描述
- The overall survival (OS) of older AML patients has not been improved during the last decades with intensive chemotherapy based on cytarabine combined with an anthracycline ("3+7").
- Next generation sequencing technology reveals that mutations in genes involved in epigenetics are frequently mutated in AML (e.g. DNMT3a), suggesting an important role of epigenetics in the pathophysiology of AML. Decitabine (given in a 5-day schedule) has been shown to be superior to low-dose Ara-C.
- A retrospective analysis revealed that epigenetic therapy (either azacitidine or decitabine) is associated with similar survival rates as intensive chemotherapy in older patients (n=671) with newly diagnosed AML.
- The recently published encouraging phase 2 data with the 10-day decitabine schedule suggests that decitabine results in similar CR rates compared with intensive chemotherapy. Allogeneic transplantation (alloHCT) also offers the opportunity for cure among older AML patients, therefore treatment strategies should aim to allograft older AML patients.
- Decitabine treatment can lead to very interesting cure rates when used as "bridging" to allografting.
Based on the data summarized above, we hypothesize that decitabine at a daily dose of 20 mg/m² starting with the 10-day schedule followed by an alloHCT or by continuation of 5-days decitabine cycles is superior to conventional intensive chemotherapy in older AML patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
standard combination chemotherapy
干预措施: standard combination chemotherapy (Drug)
decitabine
干预措施: decitabine (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Overall survival (OS)
时间窗: 4.9 years from first patient in
次要结局
- Occurrence of adverse events (AEs)(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Transplantation feasibility(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Outcome post-transplantation(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Health economics impact of each treatment arm(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaires(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization to the date of either first progression, first relapse or death, whichever occurs first(4.9 years from first patient in)
- complete response (CR/CRi) rate(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Overall CR/CRi rate(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Disease-free survival (DFS) from CR or CRi(4.9 years from first patient in)
- Prognostic value of baseline physical and functional conditions on treatment outcome using geriatric assessment tools(4.9 years from first patient in)
