Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02285127
NCT02285127CompletedNot Applicable

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study

Mayo Clinic1 site in 1 country168 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
168
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
SF (short form)-36

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Is there a functional outcome difference when treating pertrochanteric fractures with a short or long cephalomedullary nail?

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •AO/OTA fracture classification 31(A-B) (1-3).
  • •Age greater than 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Less than 18 years old.

Arms & Interventions

Short nail implant

Active Comparator

used to treat pertrochanteric fractures

Intervention: Short versus long cephalomedullary Intramedullary nail (Procedure)

Long nail implant

Active Comparator

used to treat pertrochanteric fractures

Intervention: Short versus long cephalomedullary Intramedullary nail (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

SF (short form)-36

Time Frame: 3 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Harris Hip Score(3 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Stephen A. Sems

Assistant Professor of Orthopedics

Mayo Clinic

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials