Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00765869
NCT00765869UnknownNot Applicable

A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Bowel Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Adults With Low Education and Literacy

University of Sydney1 site in 1 country555 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
555
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Informed choice

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a decision aid (written information booklet designed to facilitate informed decision making) to help people aged 55-64 years, with low levels of education and literacy, make an informed choice about bowel cancer screening, using faecal occult blood testing.

Detailed Description

Several countries have recently implemented national bowel cancer screening programs. To ensure equal access to screening, consumer information is needed to suit adults ranging in literacy level. Decision aids (DAs) are tools which have been developed to assist patients and consumers make informed health decisions and encourage active participation in health care decisions. Their use in a wide range of clinical settings has increased dramatically. However, most DAs are highly dependent upon high levels of literacy and numeracy, and few have been developed for low literacy populations.

This primary aims of this study are to assess the impact of the decision aid on (1) the proportion of adults who make an informed choice about bowel cancer screening (using faecal occult blood test) and, (2) the level of involvement in screening decisions among adults with lower levels of education and literacy.

There are three secondary aims of the study. First, to measure the effect of the decision support tool on decisional conflict, decision satisfaction, anxiety, and bowel cancer worry. Second, to identify participant's screening interest, intentions and behavior. Thirdly, we will explore participant's reactions towards the information materials they receive and whether the doctor influenced their screening decision.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
55 Years to 64 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Men and women aged 55-64 years
  • •Lower levels of education
  • •English as a main language spoken at home
  • •Average risk of bowel cancer

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Higher levels of education
  • •Invitation to take part in bowel cancer screening in last two years
  • •Personal or strong family history of bowel cancer
  • •Had a bowel cancer screening test in the last two years

Arms & Interventions

1

Experimental

Bowel cancer screening decision aid, DVD and Question Prompt List (QPL)

Intervention: Bowel cancer screening decision aid (Other)

2

Experimental

Bowel cancer screening decision with DVD only

Intervention: Bowel cancer screening decision aid (Other)

3

Active Comparator

Australian Government Bowel Cancer Screening consumer information booklet

Intervention: Australian Government Bowel Cancer Screening booklet (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Informed choice

Time Frame: 2 weeks post intervention

Involvement in screening decision

Time Frame: 2 weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcomes

  • Anxiety(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Bowel cancer worry(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Decisional conflict(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Decision satisfaction(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Bowel cancer screening interest(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Bowel cancer screening intentions(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Screening behaviour(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Self reported bowel cancer symptoms(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Evaluation of intervention materials(2 weeks post intervention)
  • Influence of doctor on screening decision(2 weeks post intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials