MedPath

CHOICE: CHanges to Treatment and Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Initiating InjeCtablE Therapy

Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Drug: exenatide
Drug: any human insulin or analog insulin(s) given in any regimen by subcutaneous injection
Registration Number
NCT00635492
Lead Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Brief Summary

Patients initiating injectable therapy for type 2 diabetes (insulin or exenatide) in usual clinical practice will be enrolled and followed up for two years in order to describe actual practice with regards to the time on initial treatment regime, whether treatment regimens are being modified, what treatment modifications are made, and clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
2515
Inclusion Criteria
  • are aged 18 or above
  • diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
  • have had a treatment decision made within the normal course of care to initiate either insulin or exenatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
  • have not previously been treated with either insulin or exenatide
  • are not simultaneously participating in another study which includes an investigational drug or procedure at study entry
  • have been fully informed and given their written consent for use of their data
  • have sufficient understanding of the primary language of their country such that they will be able to complete the questionnaires.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1exenatideexenatide
2any human insulin or analog insulin(s) given in any regimen by subcutaneous injectioninsulin
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Estimates of Probability to Remain on Initial Injectable Treatment at 12 and 24 Months.Month 24

The primary objective of this study is to estimate the time spent on initial treatment regime before significant treatment change for patients with type 2 diabetes initiating therapy with either insulin or exenatide for the first time.

Initial treatment regime is defined as the treatment regime prescribed when the patient is enrolled in the study.

Significant treatment change for patients initiated on insulin or exenatide is defined as at least one of the following:

Insulin:

* Addition of a new medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

* A change in the number of times insulin is administered per day

* Discontinuation of any insulin initiated at baseline

* Substitution of a human insulin for an analogue insulin or vice-versa.

* Switching between brands of the same class/type of insulin is not included in the definition of significant treatment change.

Exenatide:

* Addition of a new medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

* Discontinuation of exenatide.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Higher Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1) Associated With Treatment Choice at BaselineBaseline

Higher HbA1c was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline.HbA1c was reported in percent of hemoglobin. The mean HbA1c at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for HbA1c=1% higher.

Higher Random Glucose Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline6 months prior to Baseline

Random Glucose 1 millimole per liter (mmol/L) higher was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. Random glucose is a glucose within the last 6 months prior to baseline. The mean is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for the glucose 1 mmol/L higher. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Higher Value of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Associated With Treatment Choice at BaselineBaseline

Higher (1 mmol/L higher) LDL cholesterol was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The mean LDL cholesterol at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for 1 mmol/L higher at baseline. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 24Baseline, Month 24

Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 24

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <7.0% at Month 24Month 24

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration \<7.0% at Month 24. Only patients with baseline HbA1c \>= 7.0 % were included in this analysis

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 24Month 24

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration \<6.5% at Month 24. Note: Only patients with baseline HbA1c \>=6.5% were included in this analysis.

Frequent Blood Glucose Self Monitoring Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline4 weeks prior to Baseline

Frequent glucose self-testing (1 test/week more) was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The mean number of self monitoring blood glucose tests per week over the last 4 weeks prior to baseline was determined at baseline and is provided below. The statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Reasons for Discontinuation of Baseline RegimenBaseline to Month 24

Reasons for Discontinuation of Baseline Regimen

Factors Associated With Treatment Change in Exenatide BID CohortBaseline to Month 24

Hazards ratios from Backward Cox Regression Model for time to significant treatment change in Exenatide BID cohort. EQ-5D (Health Questionnaire Copyright @ Euro QoL Group 1998).

Disinhibited Eating Associated With Treatment Choice at BaselineBaseline

Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18) - consists of 18 items across 3 domains (psychological distress, barriers to activity, and disinhibited eating), with each item standardized score rated from 0-100; 0=no dysfunction, higher numbers=greater dysfunction. The subscale of disinhibited eating was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The number of participants with disinhibited eating at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for disinhibited eating. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Incidence of Hypoglycemia Between Baseline and 24 MonthsBaseline to Month 24

Incidence of Hypoglycemia between Baseline and 24 Months

Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Between Baseline and 24 MonthsBaseline to Month 24

Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Between Baseline and 24 Months

Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With Treatment Choice at BaselineBaseline

Higher BMI was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. BMI was calculated as body weight in kilograms (kg) divided by height in meters (m) squared (kg/m\^2). The mean BMI at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for BMI=1 kg/m\^2 higher. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 24Baseline, Month 24

Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 24

Factors Associated With Treatment Change in Insulin CohortBaseline to Month 24

Hazards ratios from Backward Cox Regression Model for time to significant treatment change in Insulin cohort

Percentage of Patients Contacting Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 MonthsBaseline to Month 24

Percentage of Patients Contacting Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months

Number of Contacts With Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 MonthsBaseline to Month 24

Number of contacts with Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months

Diet and Exercise Advice in Diabetes Management Associated With Treatment Choice at BaselineBaseline

Receipt of diet and exercise advice was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The number of participants who checked yes or no during the baseline visit for prior receipt of diet/exercise advice in his/her Diabetes management is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Incidence of Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Between Baseline and 24 MonthsBaseline to Month 24

Incidence of Gastro Intestinal Symptoms between Baseline and 24 Months

Older Age Associated With Treatment Choice at BaselineBaseline

Older age (1 year older) was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The mean age at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for age 1 year older. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment).

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Research Site

🇸🇪

Vastervik, Sweden

Research

🇩🇪

Birkenfeld, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath