Drug-eluting Balloon vs. Conventional Balloon in the Treatment of (re)Stenosis (Dialysis Fistulae)
- Conditions
- Restenosis, Vascular GraftVascular Access ComplicationDialysis Related Complications
- Interventions
- Device: Angioplasty with drug-eluting balloonDevice: Conventional angioplasty
- Registration Number
- NCT03036241
- Lead Sponsor
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of drug-eluting balloons is effective in the treatment of (re)stenosis in dialysis fistulae.
- Detailed Description
Drug-eluting devices have proved beneficial in the treatment of stenosis in native coronary and lower limb arteries. Stenosis and restenosis is a known problem in dialysis fistulae and drug-eluting devices might be beneficial in this field as well.
In the procedure a conventional balloon is passed through the stenosis which is then dilated. After this patients are randomized before a second dilatation with either a conventional balloon or a drug-coated balloon.
The stenosis is evaluated preoperatively and followed up by means of ultrasound by a vascular technician. Follow-up will end at 12 months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 39
- Any dialysis access w/ native vessels warranting intervention
- Previous PTA with drug-eluting balloon, thrombolysis, coagulopathy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Drug-eluting balloon Angioplasty with drug-eluting balloon - Conventional angioplasty Conventional angioplasty -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TLR 12 months Target lesion revascularization, ie. re-intervention to the same lesion
Occlusion of access 12 months Any loss of dialysis access due to thrombosis
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary assisted patency 12 months Patency after endovascular reintervention due to restenosis or thrombosis
Death 12 months