Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04870463
NCT04870463CompletedNot Applicable

Apical External Root Resorption Secondary to Orthodontic Forces and Individual Radicular Stress: Randomised Clinical Trial

Universidad Complutense de Madrid1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: September 13, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Difference of volume of the apical portion of the root

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the possible superiority of a treatment compared to the gold standard of reference in Orthodontics.

Detailed Description

Apical external root resorption is defined as the loss of dental hard tissues such as dentine, cement and alveolar bone. This is considered an irrevocable effect associated to different factors, among which dental movement during orthodontic treatment is related.

This study suggest to compare root resorption after the use of two different types of alignment and levelling arches in orthodontics. Consecutive patients randomly chosen will be analysed after going through one of the two arches sequences:

  1. Gold standard group: using arches that provide the same amount of force in all sections . 3M United® nickel-titanium arches (0.012, 0.014, 0.016 x 0.016, 0.020 x 0.020, 0.018 x 0.025 y 0.019 x 0.025)
  2. Intervention group: using some arches that provide individual sectional forces for each dental group (incisors, premolars and molars). 3M United® nickel-titanium 0.012 and 0.014 arches and BioForce PLUS® arches (0.016 x 0.016, 0.020 x 0.020, 0.018 x 0.025 y 0.019 x 0.025).

All patients will be treated with multi-braces fixed appliances (0.022" technique and VictoryTM brackets).

Root resorption will be compared through CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) images made before the beginning of treatment (T0), after 8-9 months of the beginning of treatment (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2). Root resorption will be measured by the root volume and surface root morphology in each of the times scheduled.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
12 Years to 50 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Study Population: patients undergoing orthodontic treatment in Orthodontic Department at Dental School of Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •Completed permanent dentition (third molars are excluded)
  • •Completed root formation
  • •Need of orthodontic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Tooth agenesis in the anterior region (incisors)
  • •Included or ankylosed teeth in the anterior region (incisors)
  • •Periodontal pocket >3 mm in any anterior teeth (incisors)
  • •Need of a combined surgical and orthodontic treatment
  • •Root resorptions observed at the initial CBCT (in more than 3 teeth)
  • •Delay of the treatment due to a external reason or complication during treatment
  • •Systemic disease or cranio-facial malformation
  • •Tooth fracture or restoration in the anterior region (incisors) at the beginning of treatment
  • •Problems from roots such as lacerated root, trauma or fractures during treatment 10 Severe occlusal attrition

Arms & Interventions

Gold Standard Group

Active Comparator

Patients treated with multi-braces fixed appliances and a conventional sequence of aligning and levelling arches (Ni-Ti arches with the same force in all sections)

Intervention: Maxillary and mandibular Cone Beam Computed Tomography record (Procedure)

Intervention Group

Experimental

Patients treated with multi-braces fixed appliances and a different sequence of aligning and levelling arches (some arches provide individual forces for each group of teeth (incisors, premolars and molars))

Intervention: Maxillary and mandibular Cone Beam Computed Tomography record (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Difference of volume of the apical portion of the root

Time Frame: Baseline/beginning treatment (T0), 34 weeks after beginning treatment (T1) and through treatment completion (T2)

Measure of the 5 more apical mm3 of the root at each moment of treatment (T0, T1 and T2)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Root volumen(Baseline/beginning treatment (T0), 34 weeks after beginning treatment (T1) and through treatment completion (T2))
  • Root surface area(Baseline/beginning treatment (T0), 34 weeks after beginning treatment (T1) and through treatment completion (T2))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials