The Efficacy Of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization At Lumbar Region Disc Herniations
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif University
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Assessment of pain (VAS)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study was carried out to investigate the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in patients with lomber region disc herniation. 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation between the ages of 30-65 were included in the study. Following the evaluation, the patients were divided into two groups by closed envelope method; control group (n=30) and experimental group (n=30). In both groups, 4 weeks (20 sessions) hot pack (hotpack), conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic physical therapy program with therapeutic ultrasound applications were performed. In addition to this program, Instrumental Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) was applied to the experimental group in 12 sessions of 3 times a week. This technique was performed by using stainless steel tools of different sizes and shapes. IASTM treatment was performed (including SWEEP-FAN-BRUSH-SWEEP technique, 45° angle with the skin, by 8-10 repetitions) for the ilicostalis lumborum, priformis, gluteus medius, erector spines, quadratus lumborum muscles, superficial and deep fascia. Depression levels of the patients were evaluated with Beck Depression Scale, before the treatment and after 4 weeks pain severity, VAS pain scale, functional status with Oswestry Scale, quality of life with Short Form-36 (SF-
- and normal range of motion with goniometer. The results were analyzed by using SPSS v.20 program. In all analyzes, the significance ratio was accepted as p <0.05. At the end of the four-week treatment program, significant improvements were observed in VAS levels, normal joint movements (flexion, extension, right-left lateral flexion, rotation) in both groups (p <0.05). Oswestry and Beck Depression Scale scores showed significant improvement merely in the experimental group compared to the control group (p <0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS values, normal joint motion and Oswestry scale while there was no notable difference in SF-36 and Beck Depression Scale. As a result of the study, it was concluded that IASTM is a more effective method on normal range of motion and functionality in comparison with traditional physiotherapy program in patients with lumbar disc herniation and it can be used as an alternative method in patients during the physiotherapy and rehabilitation program if needed.
Investigators
Ali Yıldırım
Principal Investigator
Bezmialem Vakif University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Bulging and protruding disc presence
- •Facet joint problem
- •Mechanical low back pain
Exclusion Criteria
- •Extruded and sequestrated disc presence
- •Previous operational status through the lumbar region
- •Having inflammatory pain (osteoarthritis)
- •Pain associated with malignancy (primary or metastatic tumors)
- •Severe psychological discomfort
- •Having communication problems
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Assessment of pain (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 week
The pain intensities of the patients at rest, during the activity and at night were determined using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS is an easy-to-apply scale, as values that cannot be measured numerically can be digitized and quickly understood. The patients were asked to mark their severity (rest, activity, night) on a 10 cm line. The starting point of the truth was '' 0 '' '' I have no pain '', the end point was '' 10 '' '' I have pain of unbearable severity ''. The point that the patient marked on the right was measured with a ruler and recorded in "cm". Localization of the pain, its frequency and the causes that increase and decrease pain were questioned and recorded. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was performed.
Evaluation of normal joint motion (NEH)
Time Frame: 4 week
The limitation of flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation movements of the lumbosacral joint was measured using a universal goniometer. All normal joint movements were repeated 3 times and the average of the obtained values was recorded in degrees.
Evaluation of depression
Time Frame: 4 week
Depression level of the patients was evaluated by Beck Depression questionnaire. The scale developed by Beck consists of 21 questions. 4-point Likert scoring is used in the scale. Each item gets points between 0-3. The total score ranges from 0-63. Points obtained from the survey; 0-10 points → no depression 11-17 points → mild depression 18-23 points → moderate depression 24 points above → interpreted as severe depression. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted.
Demographic information
Time Frame: 4 week
Personal information (name, surname, address, telephone, marital status, educational status, occupational and health security), demographic and clinical information (age (year), gender, height (cm), weight (kg), BMI of all patients participating in the study (calculated by the formula of the ratio of body weight to neck squared (kg / m²)), information about the disease, drugs used for lumbar disc hernia, other drugs used, presence of chronic disease, surgical history, smoking and alcohol use\] by questioning '' Demographic Information Forms '' recorded.
Functional evaluation for low back pain
Time Frame: 4 week
Oswestry Disability Index was used to evaluate the disability caused by low back pain. The scale evaluates how much back pain affects daily life activities. Pain severity consists of 10 questions evaluating personal care, weight lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleep quality, social life, ability to travel and the degree of pain. Six-point likert scoring is used. A high total score indicates an increase in disability. The Turkish validity and reliability study of this scale was conducted. Points obtained from the survey; 0% - 20% → minimal disability 20% to 40% → mild disability 40% to 60% → severe disability 60% - 80% → complete limitation 80% - 100% → bed-dependent (or symptoms are exaggerated)
Evaluation of the quality of life
Time Frame: 4 week
Quality of life was assessed with the survey "SF-36 (Short form-36) quality of life". SF-36 is a generic scale that evaluates the overall health status. It consists of 36 questions that evaluate 2 main (physical and mental component) and 8 sub parameters (physical function, emotional function, physical role, social function, mental health, pain, general health and vitality). The score of each subgroup is evaluated between 0-100. A high score indicates that the quality of life is good. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the SF-36 questionnaire was conducted.