Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01710579
NCT01710579CompletedNot Applicable

Ano-rectal 3D High Resolution Manometry: Normal Values and Comparison With Ultrasound Examination in Healthy Volunteers, Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Patients With Constipation

Hospices Civils de Lyon1 site in 1 country127 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
127
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Ano-rectal manometry is indicative in patients with either fecal incontinence or constipation. Recently anorectal 3D- high resolution manometry has been developed. Pressure variations are measured circumferentially along the anal canal. It may allow a better understanding of anorectal disorders by displaying anal pressure asymmetry and it could be useful to assess the functional anatomy of the pelvic floor better than conventional manometry.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Subject older than 18 years Absence of anorectal symptoms (no constipation, no fecal incontinence) Absence of pelvic floor disorders Vaizey score = 0 Kess score < 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent Non inclusion criteria: Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Previous ano-rectal surgery Pelvic radiotherapy Neurological disorder Diabetes mellitus
  • •Arm 2: 50 patients with fecal incontinence
  • •Inclusion criteria:
  • •Subject older than 18 years Patient referred for anorectal manometry and/or ultrasound examination Fecal incontinence as main complain Vaizey score > 6 Kess score < 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent
  • •Non inclusion criteria:
  • •Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Rectal tumor Rectal stenosis Ileo-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis Anal fissure Anal fistula Arm 3: 50 patients with constipation
  • •Inclusion criteria:
  • •Subject older than 18 years Patient referred for anorectal manometry and/or ultrasound examination Constipation as main complain Feeling of incomplete evacuation and/or manual disimpaction defined as needing to press in or around the anus to aid defecation Vaizey score < 6 Kess score < 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent
  • •Non inclusion criteria:
  • •Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Rectal tumor Rectal stenosis Ileo-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis Anal fissure Anal fistula

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

ARM 1 Healthy Volunteers

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial) (Procedure)

ARM 1 Healthy Volunteers

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry (Procedure)

ARM 1 Healthy Volunteers

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe) (Procedure)

ARM 2: Patients with fecal incontinence

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry (Procedure)

ARM 2: Patients with fecal incontinence

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe) (Procedure)

ARM 2: Patients with fecal incontinence

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial) (Procedure)

ARM 3 Patients with constipation

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry (Procedure)

ARM 3 Patients with constipation

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe) (Procedure)

ARM 3 Patients with constipation

Other

Ano-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography

Intervention: Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial) (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down

Time Frame: during procedure

Following parameters will be measured at the level of anal sphincter: * Minimal pressure (amplitude and location) * Maximal pressure (amplitude and location) * Mean pressure * Asymmetry

Secondary Outcomes

  • presence of ano-rectal reflex.(during procedure)
  • Ano-rectal radial endosonography(During procedure)
  • Dynamic ano-rectal endoconography(During procedure)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials