Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04654819
NCT04654819CompletedNot Applicable

Analysis of Student Confidence Levels and Application Success Rates in Simulator Based Dental Anesthesia Education

Ankara University1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Self-reported preparedeness and confidence levels of intern dentists

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The present study investigates confidence levels reported among intern dentists who used dental anesthesia simulators, before performing local anesthesia on patients as well as patient reports on intern dentist confidence levels to deliver anesthesia injections and compare them to those who did not receive dental anesthesia simulator education. Application success rates will also be investigated and compared.

The study was carried out in the dental anesthesia simulator laboratory and in the faculty clinics of Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry. A hundred volunteer intern dentists who completed the third year of the 5-year undergraduate education program and who had not performed local anesthesia on a patient contributed. Seventy intern dentists received training on dental anesthesia simulators, and made applications on patients, while 30 intern dentists made applications without training on the dental anesthesia simulators and served as control. With a prepared single questionnaire, intern dentists made self-assessment of preparedness and confidence, educators made assessment of application success rates and treated patients evaluated intern dentists' confidence levels.

Detailed Description

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval no: 14/16). The study was carried out in the dental anesthesia simulator laboratory and in the faculty clinics of Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry within a 2-year period. During the first year of the study, the faculty did not have DAS availability. During this first year 30 intern dentists who had completed the third year of the 5-year undergraduate education program and who could not receive DAS training before their first anesthesia application on a patient, were recruited as a control group among consent to participate. During the second year of the study after DAS became available, 70 intern dentists who had completed the third year of the 5-year undergraduate education program and who had not applied local anesthesia to a patient, were recruited as a study group among consent to participate. The study group applied their first anesthesia application on a patient after DAS education.

For the study 10 conduction anesthesia models mounted on metal rods, (CAM SUG2005-UL-SP, Nissin Dental Products Kyoto, Japan, Figure.1), were provided. The part-task simulators had 11 anesthetic contact sensor points (7 in the upper jaw and 4 in the lower jaw) with 32 anatomically shaped teeth, audio signal and light signal indicators when correct position and angle was achieved. The models had clear pink upper and lower gingivae allowing view of injection, making it ideal for beginner intern dentists, while allowing a more realistic training experience.

Both groups attended theoretical presentations an interactive lesson about IANB from an oral and maxillofacial surgery professor. Technical information about DAS were also covered for the study group lessons. Following lessons, both groups answered a questionnaire concerning preparedness. Afterwards, intern dentists in the control group carried on with patient application whereas the study group carried on with DAS education before continuing on patients.

During DAS lessons the intern dentists applied IANB on simulators. The illumination of the light and sound indicator on the model as a result of injection to the pterygomandibular region was accepted as a successful application. The results of the first five IANB applications made by the intern dentists were recorded. Intern dentists who completed the DAS training completed a questionnaire.

After trainings, both groups applied IANB to a patient for the first time in the clinic and completed another questionnaire. The intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications were monitored. Tingling sensation on the lip and tongue, reported by the patient, was accepted as criteria for profound anesthesia. After achieving anesthesia, the questionnaire, was answered by the patient on whom the application was performed.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

The control group did not have access to simulators during the period of the study.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 25 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Intern dentists who had completed the third year of the 5-year undergraduate education program
  • •Not applied local anesthesia to a patient
  • •Consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Applied local anesthesia to a patient
  • •Not consenting to participate

Arms & Interventions

Control group

No Intervention

This group made anesthesia application on patients without training on simulators.

Study group

Experimental

This group made anesthesia application on patients after training on simulators.

Intervention: Dental anesthesia simulator usage (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Self-reported preparedeness and confidence levels of intern dentists

Time Frame: 2 years

Intern preparedeness and confidence levels was assesed with a questionnaire answered by the intern dentists. Questions will be answered on a 5 point scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Indecisive, Disagree, Strongly disagree.

Patients perception of intern dentist confidence levels

Time Frame: 2 years

Patients perception of intern dentist confidence was assesed with a prepared questionnaire answered by the patients. Questions will be answered on a 5 point scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Indecisive, Disagree, Strongly disagree.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Cahit UCOK

Prof. Dr.

Ankara University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials