MedPath

Selective Motor Control and Upper Extremity Functions in Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy

Completed
Conditions
Cerebral Palsy
Interventions
Other: Test of Arm Selective Control
Other: Hand Held Dynamometer
Other: Quality of Upper Extremity Skill Test
Registration Number
NCT04695639
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

Identification of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular factors that affect the integrity and functional performance in children with cerebral palsy is very essential as it enables multidisciplinary rehabilitation team to design the proper intervention to improve functional performance and independence for those children.

Detailed Description

Limited literature is available regarding the relation between selective voluntary motor control and motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. Up to our knowledge this is the first study intending to investigate the influence of selective voluntary motor control on upper extremity function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Therefore, the current study will be conducted to investigate the correlation between selective voluntary motor control and upper extremity functions in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

It is hypothesized that:-

1. There is no relation between SVMC and upper limb function in children with spastic hemiparetic CP.

2. There is no relation between upper extremity SVMC and hand grip strength in children with spastic hemiparetic CP.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ranges from 4 to 8 years.
  • Both genders.
  • Diagnosis of spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy.
  • Level I-IV on Manual Ability Classification System.
  • Spasticity grade 1 to 2 on Modified Ashworth Scale.
  • Level I-III on Gross Motor Classification System .
Exclusion Criteria
  • Significant mental or psychological problems.
  • Significant visual/auditory problem.
  • Botox injection and/or surgery of the upper limb in the past 12 months.
  • Fixed deformities in the affected upper extremity.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
cohort groupQuality of Upper Extremity Skill TestA convenient sample of children with spastic hemiparetic CP of both genders will participate in this study. To avoid type II error, sample size calculation was performed prior to the study, based on data of pilot study, using G\*POWER statistical software (version 3.1.9.2; Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany) \[Exact tests- correlational study, α=0.05, β=0.2, and effect size = 0.4\] and revealed that the appropriate sample size for this study is N=46.
cohort groupTest of Arm Selective ControlA convenient sample of children with spastic hemiparetic CP of both genders will participate in this study. To avoid type II error, sample size calculation was performed prior to the study, based on data of pilot study, using G\*POWER statistical software (version 3.1.9.2; Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany) \[Exact tests- correlational study, α=0.05, β=0.2, and effect size = 0.4\] and revealed that the appropriate sample size for this study is N=46.
cohort groupHand Held DynamometerA convenient sample of children with spastic hemiparetic CP of both genders will participate in this study. To avoid type II error, sample size calculation was performed prior to the study, based on data of pilot study, using G\*POWER statistical software (version 3.1.9.2; Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany) \[Exact tests- correlational study, α=0.05, β=0.2, and effect size = 0.4\] and revealed that the appropriate sample size for this study is N=46.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Test of Arm Selective Control1/2/2021 to 30/4/2021

The goal of the assessment is to systematically evaluate a person's ability to move the upper extremity with selective voluntary motor control by observing movement control, coordination, fluency, mirroring, and speed at each joint, and then assigning a grade. Each joint is scored as a 0, 1, or 2. The joints of the affected limb are summed for a limb score for a total score. The maximum score is 16 per side, or 32 points in total (in hemiplegia assess the affected side only) with higher score indicates better performance. Admiration of the teat items and scoring will be conducted according to the scale user instructions.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hand Held Dynamometer1/2/2021 to 30/4/2021

to evaluate hand grip strength

Quality of Upper Extremity Skill Test1/2/2021 to 30/4/2021

to assess upper limb function

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

faculty of physical therapy, Cairo university

🇪🇬

Giza, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath