CTRI/2022/11/047511
Not yet recruiting
未知
A prospective, observational study to compare the patient reported outcomes with the use of oral dydrogesterone vs. micronized vaginal progesterone in high risk pregnancies (PERCEPT study) - PERCEPT
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O092- Supervision of pregnancy with other poor reproductive or obstetric history
- Sponsor
- Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\.Pregnant women with age of \>\= 18 years and who are ready to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- •2\.Women with clinically diagnosed pregnancy of \<\= 12 weeks of gestation and visiting department of obstetrics and gynecology.
- •3\.History of more than two miscarriages and/or presenting with vaginal bleeding
- •4\.Patient suitable for treatment with micronized vaginal progesterone or dydrogesterone therapy based on locally approved prescribing information.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\.Pregnant women who have contraindications for use of micronized vaginal progesterone or dydrogesterone.
- •2\.Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, does not justify the patientâ??s inclusion in the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
airway assessment to predict difficult endotracheal intubatioHealth Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalCTRI/2021/10/037057Government Institute of Medical sciences
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A study on effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel on inflammatory markers, in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventioHealth Condition 1: E08-E13- Diabetes mellitusHealth Condition 2: I20-I25- Ischemic heart diseasesCTRI/2023/06/054193Dr Ankita Panigrahy
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Prospective observational comparison study between endovascular treatment devices for femoropopliteal arterial diseasePeripheral Arterial diseaseJPRN-UMIN000042918Kameda Medical Center600
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of blind versus USG guided spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients posted for truma surgeryCTRI/2017/11/010567Department of Anaesthesia60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
To compare the RIPASA and modified alvarado score in to diagnose acute appendicitis and find out a better scoring system, so that the negative appendectomy rates are decreased.Health Condition 1: K358- Other and unspecified acute appendicitisCTRI/2022/11/047668Kasturba Hospital, Manipal.