Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05068648
NCT05068648CompletedNot Applicable

Wheelchair Backs That Support the Spinal Curves: Assessing Postural and Functional Changes

Craig Hospital3 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Pelvic Angle

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The overall objective of this fully powered clinical trial is to investigate if using a solid backrest on a manual wheelchair (MWC) will improve postural alignment, function and wheelchair mobility, as compared with an upholstery backrest, and to explore the impact of overall back height, contour, and seat gap when using a solid backrest in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Detailed Description

A properly fit wheelchair and seating system can have a profound impact on the daily life of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). A backrest that supports the natural spinal curves is thought to enhance posture, functional mobility, and comfort for manual wheelchair (MWC) users. In fact, therapists routinely prescribe after-market posture-backs based on clinical reasoning. However, there is little research comparing the efficacy of an after-market posture-back to the standard upholstery back, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify these to group insurance payers.

Based on this, investigators performed a pilot study to investigate whether there were postural and/or functional differences between using a standard upholstery WC back and an after-market solid posture-back. The results of that study have been presented at the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) annual conference in November 2019 and the Combined Sections Meeting (CSM) of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) in February 2020, and were also published in the Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine in 2020.

Although the results of that study demonstrated clinical relevance and statistical trends for improvements in postural alignment and functional outcomes when using a solid back, there was not enough power to establish statistical significance. It also did not evaluate the effect of backrest height and position or depth of contour in order to inform clinical practice. The overall objective of this fully powered clinical trial is to further investigate if using a solid backrest on MWC will improve postural alignment, function and wheelchair mobility, as compared with an upholstery backrest; and to explore the impact of overall back height, seat gap, and contour when using a solid backrest.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Full time manual wheelchair users
  • •Motor complete SCI from C6-T4
  • •Age 18-70 at time of testing
  • •Time since injury > 3 month at time of testing

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Weight >250 pounds
  • •Current pressure ulcer at time of testing
  • •Significant shoulder pain that precludes independent mobility at time of testing
  • •Insufficient range of motion to achieve neutral pelvis and spine at time of testing
  • •Orthopedic restrictions requiring a brace that would impact functional outcome measures
  • •Shoulder flexion range of motion <120 degrees at time of testing
  • •PSIS-to-Inferior Angle of scapula measurement less than 8 inches or greater than 16 inches
  • •Cognitive deficits or visual impairment that would impair ability to give informed consent or to follow simple instructions during testing
  • •Children, pregnant women and prisoners will not participate in this study

Arms & Interventions

MWC Configuration 1

Active Comparator

standard upholstery back that promotes posterior pelvic tilt set at or below cushion level and 1" above inferior angle

Intervention: Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration (Other)

MWC Configuration 2

Active Comparator

active contour back positioned with seat gap and with free scapulae

Intervention: Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration (Other)

MWC Configuration 3

Active Comparator

active contour back positioned with seat gap and with blocked scapulae

Intervention: Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration (Other)

MWC Configuration 4

Active Comparator

deep contour back positioned with seat gap and with free scapulae

Intervention: Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration (Other)

MWC Configuration 5

Active Comparator

deep contour back positioned without seat gap and with free scapulae

Intervention: Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pelvic Angle

Time Frame: Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.

Frontal Pelvic Angle

Time Frame: Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Vertical Forward Reach Test (VFRT)(Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.)
  • Spinal Angle of Kyphosis(Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.)
  • Timed Forward Wheeling(Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.)
  • Timed ramp ascent(Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.)
  • One Stroke Push Test(Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.)
  • Frontal Sternal Angle(Throughout study completion; average of 2 years.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Candace Tefertiller

Executive Director of Research and Evaluation

Craig Hospital

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials