MedPath

Automated Harness Tightener for Child Safety Seat

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Child Passenger Safety
Interventions
Device: Prototype child safety seat with tension indicator lights
Device: Control child safety seat
Registration Number
NCT04408417
Lead Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Brief Summary

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a tensioning progress indicator light to achieve proper harness tensioning in child safety seats.

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether a prototype convertible child safety seat with visual indication of successful tensioning technology reduces the amount of harness slack compared with a standard safety seat. The secondary objective of the study is to assess caregivers' perceptions of the quality, design, and ease of use of the prototype child safety seat tensioning progress indicator lights. Participants will be parents/caregivers aged 18 to 75 years of children between 6 and 24 months of age. Approximately 130 caregiver-child dyads will be enrolled. Participants will be asked to harness their child into two versions of a convertible child safety seat, twice in each car seat. The intervention seat will be equipped with the technology that gives visual indication of successful harness tensioning. Participants will be observed, assessed, and asked a series of survey questions after each harnessing period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
92
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults aged 18-75 years who are the parent/legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-24 months
  • Parent/legal guardian has harnessed a child into a safety seat in the last 30 days
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-fluency in written and/or spoken English
  • Parent/legal guardian cannot install, and/or child cannot be harnessed into, a safety seat due to a physical or health limitation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Harnessing Sequence APrototype child safety seat with tension indicator lightsParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: control, prototype, prototype, control.
Harnessing Sequence AControl child safety seatParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: control, prototype, prototype, control.
Harnessing Sequence BControl child safety seatParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: prototype, control, control, prototype.
Harnessing Sequence CPrototype child safety seat with tension indicator lightsParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: control, control, prototype, prototype.
Harnessing Sequence BPrototype child safety seat with tension indicator lightsParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: prototype, control, control, prototype.
Harnessing Sequence CControl child safety seatParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: control, control, prototype, prototype.
Harnessing Sequence DPrototype child safety seat with tension indicator lightsParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: prototype, prototype, control, control.
Harnessing Sequence DControl child safety seatParticipants will harness their child into the 2 different child safety seats in the following order: prototype, prototype, control, control.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in harness tensionUp to 5 minutes

After each of the four harnessing periods, the tension force on the safety seat harness will be measured with a load cell in Newtons and/or a qualitative "pinch" test which provides a binary value of tight vs not-tight. Within-participant harness tension is compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Participant perceptions of usability of the tension progress indicator light technology: survey30 minutes

Participant perceptions of the usability of the technology will be collected and the control and prototype harnessing systems will be compared. Participants will be asked to complete a post-intervention survey that contains 4 items pertaining to the usability of the technology through Likert scales (range from Very difficult to Very easy). There is no overall score for these survey items.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Roberts Center for Pediatric Research

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath