MedPath

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Spanish-language Executive Function Intervention for Neurodivergent Children

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Autism
ADHD
Registration Number
NCT07084324
Lead Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the Spanish-language version of Unstuck and On Target (SL-Unstuck), an executive functioning (EF) intervention, is feasible, acceptable, and effective for Spanish-speaking caregivers and their neurodivergent children (ages 8-11) in the U.S.. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is SL-Unstuck acceptable to Spanish-speaking caregivers and children?

* Does SL-Unstuck improve child EF, caregiver EF knowledge, and caregiver strain?

Researchers will compare families randomly assigned to immediate SL-Unstuck versus waitlist control to see if participating in the intervention improves EF and family outcomes.

Participants will:

* Attend 8 weekly SL-Unstuck sessions at a clinic (parallel child and caregiver groups)

* Complete pre- and post-intervention assessments on child EF, caregiver strain, and satisfaction

* Participate in a focus group to share feedback on the intervention

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Child is 8-11 years old.
  • Child meets DSM-5 criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or ADHD
  • Child has verbal skills at a 7-year-old level or greater (as measured by WASI Vocabulary and Similarities subtests)
  • Caregiver endorses at least one of the following executive functioning problems:
  • Difficulty accepting feedback or criticism.
  • Difficulty handling frustration.
  • Difficulty starting non-preferred activities.
  • Frequent meltdowns.
  • Not stopping a behavior after being told to stop.
  • Shutting down in the face of a challenge.
  • Caregiver is at least 18 years old.
  • Caregiver identifies Spanish as their preferred or primary language.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Individuals will be excluded only if they do not meet one or more of the inclusion criteria listed above.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Executive Function Challenge TaskAt baseline and 1 month post-implementation.

The Executive Functioning Challenge Task deliberately tests a child's ability to utilize key executive functions like planning and flexibility by presenting scenarios that reveal potential areas of difficulty in their EF skills. The test yields Flexibility and Planning raw scores with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 8. Higher scores indicate greater impairment in executive functioning. A total executive functioning raw score is also calculated as the sum of planning and flexibility scores.

Values below represent the change in average raw scores from baseline to post-intervention for participating children.

Negative scores represent an overall decrease in executive functioning impairment (better outcome) while positive scores representing an increase in executive functioning impairment (worse outcome) from baseline to post when looking at the condition groups as a whole.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Second EditionAt baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-implementation.

The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function- Second Edition is a 63-item rating scale completed by caregivers to assess executive function impairment in children. T scores have a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a minimum score of 30 and maximum score of 95. Scales assessed included the Behavioral Regulation Index, Emotion Regulation Index and Cognitive Regulation Index, together forming an overall composite score, the Global Executive Composite. Values below represent the change in T-scores scores from baseline to post-intervention for participating children. T scores at or above 70 are considered clinically significant.

Scores represent the change in T scores from baseline to post. Negative values represent decrease in impairment (better outcome) while positive scores representing an increase in impairment (worse outcome) from baseline to post when looking at the condition groups as a whole.

Flexibility Interference QuestionnaireAt baseline and 1 month post-implementation.

A brief questionnaire developed by researchers for parents to report how often their child's difficulties with flexibility interfere with daily adaptive functioning. It includes seven items addressing different real-world impacts, each scored on a Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no impact of executive function difficulties and 3 indicates severe impact. Total scores range from 0 (least interfering) to 21 (most interfering).

Caregiver Strain Questionnaire- Short Form 7At baseline and 1 month post-implementation.

The Caregiver Strain Questionnaire-Short Form 7 is a seven item self-reported questionnaire of objective and subjective internalized caregiver strain that has been translated into Spanish. Caregivers rate how difficult or impactful different situations have been over the past month as a result of their child's behavior on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 "not at all" to 5 "very much." Scores are summed for a total range of 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating greater strain.

Executive Functions Knowledge QuestionnaireAt baseline and 1 month post-implementation.

A set of 15 true/false or multiple-choice items assesses knowledge of executive function skills and support strategies. Each question is scored as correct or incorrect, and scores are summed to yield a total number of correct responses.

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.