Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Robotic Rehabilitation on Ambulation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Interventions
- Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Registration Number
- NCT06248476
- Lead Sponsor
- Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
Comparison of different types of transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques which are intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with spinal cord injury
- Detailed Description
iTBS lasts shorter than rTMS so that this technique comfortable than rTMS for both patients and also physicians. Aim of this study is to compare effectiveness of this techniques. If results are same, iTBS can be used instead of rTMS.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Incomplete spinal cord injury (ASIA C and D)
- 12 months after spinal cord injury
- At least 10 meters walking independent or with canadian, walker or walking stick
- Put signature to approved form
- Epileptic seizure
- Pacemaker
- Pregnancy
- Neurological disease different from spinal cord injury
- Metalic implant in brain or scalp
- Brain surgery
- Orthopedic problem in lower extremity
- Malignity
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description sham iTBS + robotic rehabilitation Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham iTBS combined with robotic rehabilitation and conservative treatment applied to patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury iTBS + robotic rehabilitation Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation iTBS combined with robotic rehabilitation and conservative treatment applied to patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury rTMS + robotic rehabilitation Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation rTMS combined with robotic rehabilitation and conservative treatment applied to patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lower extremity motor score Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week) Assesment of lower extremity key motor muscle function according to American Spinal Injury Association
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spinal cord injury independence measurement III (SCIM III) Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week) Assesment of independence of daily living activities in patients with spinal cord injury
10 meter walking test Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week) Patients with spinal cord injury walk between two markers, that distance is 10 meters
Walking index for spinal cord injury II Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week) Assesment of ambulation ability after spinal cord injury
Time up and go test Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week) Patients sit chair, then walk 3 meter, return and sit again
Motor evoked potential Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week) For assesment of cortical excitability
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey