MedPath

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Robotic Rehabilitation on Ambulation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Spinal Cord Injuries
Interventions
Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Registration Number
NCT06248476
Lead Sponsor
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

Comparison of different types of transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques which are intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with spinal cord injury

Detailed Description

iTBS lasts shorter than rTMS so that this technique comfortable than rTMS for both patients and also physicians. Aim of this study is to compare effectiveness of this techniques. If results are same, iTBS can be used instead of rTMS.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Incomplete spinal cord injury (ASIA C and D)
  • 12 months after spinal cord injury
  • At least 10 meters walking independent or with canadian, walker or walking stick
  • Put signature to approved form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Epileptic seizure
  • Pacemaker
  • Pregnancy
  • Neurological disease different from spinal cord injury
  • Metalic implant in brain or scalp
  • Brain surgery
  • Orthopedic problem in lower extremity
  • Malignity

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
sham iTBS + robotic rehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationSham iTBS combined with robotic rehabilitation and conservative treatment applied to patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
iTBS + robotic rehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationiTBS combined with robotic rehabilitation and conservative treatment applied to patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
rTMS + robotic rehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationrTMS combined with robotic rehabilitation and conservative treatment applied to patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lower extremity motor scoreBefore treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week)

Assesment of lower extremity key motor muscle function according to American Spinal Injury Association

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Spinal cord injury independence measurement III (SCIM III)Before treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week)

Assesment of independence of daily living activities in patients with spinal cord injury

10 meter walking testBefore treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week)

Patients with spinal cord injury walk between two markers, that distance is 10 meters

Walking index for spinal cord injury IIBefore treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week)

Assesment of ambulation ability after spinal cord injury

Time up and go testBefore treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week)

Patients sit chair, then walk 3 meter, return and sit again

Motor evoked potentialBefore treatment (0. week), finishing time of treatment (2.week), 4 weeks after finishing time of treatment (6.week)

For assesment of cortical excitability

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath