跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04858282
NCT04858282已完成不适用

Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center,RN, MSN

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 31 人开始时间: 2019年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
31
试验地点
1
主要终点
knowledge tests

研究概览

简要总结

To develop application-enabled shared decision-making among patients with early breast cancer and evaluate the preliminary effects of the interventions.

详细描述

Female breast is an amazing organ that it symbolizes not only the female gender, but also the continuity of human race. In the past treating breast cancer may signal a termination of the breast's predestined role in a woman or a mother. Nowadays, surgical treatment of early breast cancer has two options, one is breast-conserving surgery and the other one is total mastectomy. The former treatment option preserves most of the breast tissue but may spare dormant cancer cells in the preserved tissue. The latter treatment option spares no breast tissue and as a result no dormant cancer cells would remain. This treatment dilemma may bother most of the patients especially when they are still under the shade of the bad news. Many women are reluctant to discuss their diseased breasts with their folks or even their doctors because of privacy; instead they would seek information through internet. Unfortunately, most of their final decision is doctor's preferred choice despite they may have doubts or concerns on doctor's choice of treatment.

Share decision making (SDM) is a recently developed strategy that allows patients taking part in their treatment plan. Patients are invited to join the meeting where doctors explain the latest treatment options and patients express their concerns and finally a decision, both doctors' and patients' concerns well integrated, is reached. One of the drawbacks of SDM is too time consuming; doctors have to prepare a lot of pertinent information, while patients have to try their best to understand the provided information, though many patients may not fully understand their treatment options. It has been reported that a well designed patient decision aids (PDAs) could serve as a virtue connection between patients and doctors. Instead of merely taking information from the PDAs, it allows patients to know all the possible options of treatment and the side effects in an interactive way. It is supposed that patients could be well prepared to discuss with their doctors after interaction with the customized PDAs. In Taiwan, decision conflict and decision regret are commonly encountered among most cancer patients. The impetus for developing a PDAs for female breast cancer patients and evaluating its role on lowering decision conflict and decision regret among these patients comes from the high rates of decision conflict and decision regret among cancer patients in Taiwan.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • women, aged >20 years
  • newly diagnosed early breast cancer (stages 0-II)
  • no surgery yet
  • no metastases
  • tumor size <3 cm

排除标准

  • tumor located <2 cm from the nipple

结局指标

主要结局

knowledge tests

时间窗: immediately after the intervention

The knowledge tests included five items,1. Are the survival rates of breast cancer the same with conserving surgery and total mastectomy? 2. Breast-conserving surgery has a higher local-regional recurrence rate? 3. Is radiation therapy required for Breast-conserving surgery? 4. Does total mastectomy require longer recovery time? 5. Do both total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery have the same bleeding and infection rate? The knowledge tests included five items, such as "Are the survival rates of breast cancer the same with conserving surgery and total mastectomy?" The correct answer was coded as one point. The scores of the knowledge tests ranged from zero to five points. Higher scores indicated more correct knowledge.

Decision Regret Scale DRS

时间窗: immediately after the intervention

The Decision Regret Scale was composed of five items: "It was the right decision," "I regret the choice that was made," "I would go for the same choices if I had to do it over again," "The choices did me a lot of harm," and "The decision was a wise one." Items were scored using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from very agreed (1 point) to very disagreed (5 points), but two items were reversely scored. The higher score, the more regret.

decision conflict-sure

时间窗: immediately after the intervention

The Decision Conflict Scale (DCS_SURE) included four items: uncertainty, information, values clarity, and support and effective decision. On the scale, "Yes" answers scored one point, while "No" responses were zero points. The higher score, the lesser conflict.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Chia-Wen,Chuang

Department of Nursing, RN, MSN

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验