跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00503269
NCT00503269已完成不适用

Cost Effectiveness of Local Anaesthetic Day Surgical Haemorrhoidectomy

East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 42 人开始时间: 2005年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
42
试验地点
2
主要终点
Average pain and expectation score.

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Local anaesthetic day-care open haemorrhoidectomy (LH) is feasible, cheap and may be the cost-effective surgical approach to third degree haemorrhoids. This prospective randomised controlled trial compares patient's evaluation of LH with general anaesthetic day-care Park's modified Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (GH).

Methods: 41 patients with third degree haemorrhoids were randomised to LH (19 cases) and GH (22 cases). Demographics were comparable. Independent assessment (by a research nurse) and clinical evaluation ran parallel for 6 months. Outcome measures were average and expected pain scores for 10 days; satisfaction scores at 10 days, 6 weeks and 6 months. Secondary outcomes were journey time and cost in day surgery.

详细描述

INTRODUCTION:

Open haemorrhoidectomy is a commonly performed painful operation. In 1998-99, 26514 haemorrhoidectomies were performed in the UK of which 14373 were day cases. A further 5342 could have been performed as day surgery1. Improvements in multimodal2 and pre-emptive analgesia3, introduction of stapled anopexy4 and improvements in patient counselling5 have led to increasing number of day surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Technique of LH is described6-11 but with the paucity of randomised controlled trials this is rarely offered as a routine choice to patients with third degree haemorrhoids.

AIM:

This randomised controlled trial compares patient-evaluation of postoperative pain and expected pain scores for 10 days and satisfaction scores at 10 days, 6 weeks and 6 months between local and general anaesthetic day surgical open haemorrhoidectomy. Clinical outcomes (for 6 months), cost comparison and evaluation of total journey time in day surgical unit formed part of the study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Third degree haemorrhoids

排除标准

  • Unfit for day-surgery or general anaesthesia.

结局指标

主要结局

Average pain and expectation score.

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

  • Journey time and cost analysis(6 months.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验