Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Milled PEEK Indirect Restorations Compared to Hybird Resin Composite Indirect Restorations Over One Year Period of Time ( A Randomized Clinical Trial )

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Clinical Performance
• Interventions: Other: 3D printed PEEK restorations

• Registration Number: NCT06092697
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

Clinical performance evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and milled PEEK indirect restorations compared to hybird resin composite indirect restorations over one year period of time

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to evaluate fracture and retention, wear of 3D printed PEEK indirect restorations and milled PEEK indirect restorations compared to milled indirect hybrid resin composite restorations according to FDI criteria over one year.

According to indirect restorations cavity preparation principles, shade selection and occlusal examination will be done preoperatively, followed by cavity preparations that will be carried out with tapered diamond stones.

The prepared teeth for the indirect restorations will be scanned with an optical scanner. Then restorations will be designed by a CAD software and files will be made in STL format, so as to be ready for either 3D printing or milling with different materials.

While the printed PEEK restorations are additively made, the milled PEEK and hybrid composite restorations are both milled out of either a disc or block ( size 12) using a CAD/CAM milling machine.

After the printing and the milling procedures are complete, the restorations are then promptly removed. Each restoration will be assessed and adjusted for its cavity after the occlusal surface is recontoured. This post-processing adjustments will be applied to both 3d printed ones and milled restorations. After assessment and needed adjustments are done, all restorations will be cemented into the cavities in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

For each recall examination, two independent evaluators will perform the direct clinical evaluation for the fracture and retention at baseline, after 6 and 12 months using written criteria based on FDI world dental federation criteria. Together with the wear testing that will be performed by scanning of the restoration surfaces at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. Using parallel confocal technology, a 3D dental scanner (CEREC Primescan; Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) to attain the 3D Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models will be used. These scan models will be then introduced through a wear measuring software (Geomagic Design X; 3D Systems, Seoul, Korea) which will import, analyze, and superimpose the digitalized 3D models. So, it will automatically calculate the amount of occlusal volume lose due to wear.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2023-10
• Study Start: 2023-10
• Study First Submitted: 2023-10-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-10-15
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-10-15
• Study First Posted: 2023-10-23
• Last Update Posted: 2023-10-23
• Primary Completion: 2024-10
• Study Completion: 2025-04

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 45

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients aging (18-45) years.
• Patients with a high level of oral hygiene.
• Each patient enrolled in the study should have moderate carious lesion or defective restoration needs to be replaced on a mandibular permanent molar.
• Patients with ability to attend periodical follow-ups.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with general/systemic diseases or allergies.
• Patients with chronic use of anti- inflammatory, analgesic, and psychotropic drugs.
• Pregnant or lactating females.
• Patients with parafunctional habits.
• Patients with experience of allergic reactions against any components of the used materials.
• Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.
• Inability to comply with study procedures.
• Collateral participation in another research study.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Milled PEEK	3D printed PEEK restorations	Indirect dental restoration
3D printed PEEK	3D printed PEEK restorations	Indirect dental restoration
Hybird resin composite	3D printed PEEK restorations	Indirect dental restoration

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Fracture and retention (Category F1)(Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations- recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting)	Baseline, 6 months, 12 months	Outcome:Fracture of the material and retention Measuring device: Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations- recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting.; (Hickel et al., 2023) Measuring unit: Scoring system (Ordinal) 1. Clinically excellent/very good (sufficient) 2. Clinically good (sufficient) 3. Clinically satisfactory (sufficient) 4. Clinically unsatisfactory (partially insufficient) 5. Clinically poor (entirely insufficient)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
occlusion and wear (Category F5)	Baseline, 6 months, 12 months	Wear potential of the restoration Measuring device: A. Digital scanner (CEREC Primescan intraoral Scanner) B. Geometrical Subtraction software (Geomagic control software) (Tang et al. 2021) Measuring unit : Microns (Quantitative)