Efficacity of a Rigid Ankle Foot Orthosis for Persons With Ankle Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- Ankle Osteoarthritis
- Registration Number
- NCT04312373
- Lead Sponsor
- Union de Gestion des Etablissements des Caisses d'Assurance Maladie - Nord Est
- Brief Summary
Ankle osteoarthritis (AOA) is a typical long-term complication of an ankle injury. Pain during walking is the main symptom that limits walking distance. Non-surgical treatments could be used to decrease pain. The gold standard treatment for end-stage OA is definitive surgical ankle arthrodesis.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a rigid ankle-foot orthosis (R-AFO) for walking pain in a population suffering from AOA.
- Detailed Description
This study used the SCED introduction/withdrawal methodology to assess the efficacy of R-AFO on pain and walking distance in the 2-minute walk test (2MWT). Each patient is his or her own comparator. During phase A, considered as the baseline, the patient performs the 2MWT without R-AFO. During phases B, considered as the introduction phases, the patient performs the tests with R-AFO. These tests are performed repeatedly and at regular intervals. The time of transition between phases has been randomized to have a minimum of 3 trials per phase.
At the end of each test, an visual analogue scale for the pain and the walking distance travelled during the 2MWT were recorded.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 3
- primary or post-traumatic one-sided Ankle osteoarthritis (AOA)
- Able to walk at least two minutes
- cardiovascular diseases
- respiratory diseases that prevent subjects from performing the walking tests
- neurologic or orthopaedic diseases which could affect their gait (excluding AOA)
- inability to understand study instructions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evolution of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for walking ankle pain between each phase The VAS was performed after each 2MWT. All 2MWT were completed in one day. Scale from 0 to 10, the higher the score the higher the pain.
Evolution of the distance travelled during the 2MWT between each phase 1 day, starting from the baseline In m.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation
🇫🇷Nancy, France