A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pre-test Genetic Counseling Using an Artificial Intelligence Program and Traditional In-person Genetic Counseling in Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Who do Not Currently Meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Criteria for Genetic Testing.
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Satisfaction Survey
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Sponsor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Enrollment
- 35
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Overall comprehension as assessed by BCGCKQ
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to help better understand the uptake and impact of genetic testing for women diagnosed with breast cancer who do not meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. By doing so, the research team will gain a better understanding of the clinical implications for offering genetic testing for all patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer versus only offering genetic testing to those meeting NCCN criteria.
By offering genetic counseling and genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with breast cancer, there will be a shortage of genetic counselors. This study will also assess the feasibility of using artificial intelligence to assist in the genetic counseling process.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of pre-test genetic counseling using an artificial intelligence program and traditional in-person genetic counseling in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer who do not currently meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. The primary objectives of this study are: 1. To determine up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing 2. To assess overall patient satisfaction and comprehension in both groups The secondary objectives of this study are: 1. To assess mutation rate in the overall cohort 2. Identify reasons for not pursuing genetic testing 3. Identify any specific areas of improvement in satisfaction and comprehension 4. Assess the impact of genetic testing on Time to Treatment in this cohort 5. Develop workflow for offering genetic testing, providing pre-test genetic counseling, ordering testing, and delivering results
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Subjects diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer.
- •Patients who do not satisfy current NCCN criteria for referral to a genetics counselor and genetics testing.
- •Must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document as well as complete the study questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Arms & Interventions
in-person genetic counseling
Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor
Intervention: Satisfaction Survey
Artificial intelligence program
Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.
Intervention: Automated program (ChatBot)
Artificial intelligence program
Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.
Intervention: BCGCKQ Survey
Artificial intelligence program
Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.
Intervention: Satisfaction Survey
Artificial intelligence program
Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.
Intervention: Genetic testing
in-person genetic counseling
Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor
Intervention: Genetics counselor
in-person genetic counseling
Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor
Intervention: BCGCKQ Survey
in-person genetic counseling
Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor
Intervention: Genetic testing
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Overall comprehension as assessed by BCGCKQ
Time Frame: 3 years
Comprehension as assessed by previously validated survey consisting of 27 questions, which are a blend of True or False and multiple choice questions. The scale ranges from to , with higher scores indicating more comprehension. Comprehension will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing: survey
Time Frame: 2 years
Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing as assessed by survey. The survey is a previously validated six-question Likert scale based survey. The scale ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Satisfaction will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Published data suggest that standard deviation on the satisfaction survey is 3. A 2 point difference in average satisfaction score between groups is considered to be relevant
Percent of participants who took up genetic testing after not meeting NCCN guidelines for genetic testing
Time Frame: 2 years
Up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing
Secondary Outcomes
- Percentage of overall cohort with mutation(2 years)
- Frequencies of most common reasons for not pursuing genetic testing(2 years)
- Number of patients who decline genetic testing(2 years)
- Time to treatment(3 years)