MedPath

Comparison of Cervical Cerclage by Vaginal and by Laparoscopic Transabdominal Routes in the Periconceptional Period

Recruiting
Conditions
Cerclage, Cervical
Registration Number
NCT06788873
Lead Sponsor
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare two different surgical techniques of performing elective cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm delivery, both of which are already widely used in common clinical practice: elective cervical cerclage by the vaginal route and laparoscopic transabdominal elective cervical cerclage.

Detailed Description

For the purpose of this study, no study-specific visits are planned. Data will be collected in a pseudo-anonymized manner, assigning each participant a sequence number.

For patients who undergo elective vaginal cervical cerclage at the division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Age Medicine or laparoscopic cerclage at the division of Gynecology and Human Reproductive Pathophysiology, the normal care pathway does not include additional follow-up visits for outpatient follow-up visits.

Regarding data collected in the past as part of the normal care pathway, patients will be asked to give informed consent in the context of a follow-up visit at which a practice staff member will be present.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with unfavorable obstetric history, i.e., at least two previous preterm deliveries or second-trimester abortions who underwent elective prophylactic cervical cerclage (vaginal or laparoscopic) between 01/01/2002 and 31/12/2020
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Obtaining informed consent form
  • Availability of clinical-demographic data
Exclusion Criteria
  • Multiple pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of elective cervical cerclage vaginally and laparoscopic transabdominal elective cervical cerclageup to 100 weeks

The patients for whom such treatment is reserved are those with unfavorable obstetrical history (at least 2 preterm deliveries or abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy), who have an extremely high risk of recurrence.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between the two groupsup to 100 weeks

Live birth rate, gestational age at delivery, neonatal weight, and need for admission of the newborn to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

🇮🇹

Bologna, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath