跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02046967
NCT02046967已完成不适用

Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial of Steam Ablation Versus Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins

Erasmus Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 237 人开始时间: 2009年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
237
试验地点
2
主要终点
Obliteration of varicose vein and/ or absence of reflux (>0.5 sec. of retrograde flow over >10cm) along the treated segment of the great saphenous vein (GSV) at 12 and 52 weeks.

研究概览

简要总结

Endovenous laser ablation is a common therapy of great saphenous vein insufficiency with a very high success rate. It works by heating and thereby obliterating the vein. Steam ablation is a new therapy that also works by heating and thereby obliterating the vein. The hypothesis of this study is that steam ablation is as effective as laser ablation, but that it results in better secondary outcomes (e.g., lower pain scores).

详细描述

The study is a randomized clinical trial comparing two different therapies for endovenous ablation of great saphenous veins. The aim of the study is to test whether the anatomical success rate of Steam Ablation is not inferior to that of Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency and compare the treatment safety, patient reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness analyses between EVLA and Steam Ablation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients over 18 years old
  • Insufficiency of the GSV measured with ultrasound imaging, reflux > 0.5 s, and diameter of vein > 0.5 cm
  • Symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency
  • No prior treatment of the insufficient GSV
  • Informed consent

排除标准

  • Acute deep or superficial vein thrombosis
  • Agenesis of deep vein system
  • Vascular malformation or syndrome
  • Post-thrombotic syndrome, occlusive type
  • Pregnancy
  • Immobility
  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Arterial insufficiency

结局指标

主要结局

Obliteration of varicose vein and/ or absence of reflux (>0.5 sec. of retrograde flow over >10cm) along the treated segment of the great saphenous vein (GSV) at 12 and 52 weeks.

时间窗: 52 weeks

次要结局

  • Major complications: deep and superficial venous thrombosis (embolic events), nerve injury, skin burns, and (sub)cutaneous infections.(12 weeks)
  • Minor complications: ecchymosis, pain and hyperpigmentation.(12 weeks)
  • Health related quality of life will be measured using the Dutch Translated Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ).(12 weeks)
  • Treatment satisfaction(2 weeks)
  • Pain score(2 weeks)
  • Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)(12 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

RR van den Bos

MD, PhD

Erasmus Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Steam Ablation Versus Endovenous Laser Ablation for... | 临床试验