Does Botulinum Toxin Type-A Injection an Effective Way of Relieving Pain in Myofascial Pain Syndrome Patients or Not
- Conditions
- Myofacial Pain Syndromes
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06899438
- Lead Sponsor
- Bursa City Hospital
- Brief Summary
In this research prilocaine and botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) interventions prospectively compared to find out the effect of BoNT-A injection on myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).
The main question it aims to answer is: Does Botulinum Toxin Type-A an Effective Way of Relieving Pain in Myofascial Pain Syndrome or not?
For this purpose thirty-eight patients randomly assigned into two study groups. While BoNT-A injection group (BIG group n=19) treated with 20 units of toxin to each trigger point (TP), remaining treated with 2 ml prilocaine (PIG group n=19) with same procedure.
Pre-treatment, 2nd and 6th weeks findings were clinically recorded.
- Detailed Description
Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 4-Point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) tools were used to evaluate findings of the research.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 38
Thirty eight patients (27 female, 11 male) admitted to the PM&R (physical medicine and rehabilitation) department with at least one TP identified at neck, upper back and lower back muscles were included to the study.
Exclusion Criterias:
Recent any injection to TP within the last 2 months, Diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome, Having respiratory or cardiovascular diseases, Allergies, Having psychiatric disorders, History of shoulder or cervical intervention within the last year, Cervical myelopathy, radiculopathy, Failure of cooperation.
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Botulinum toxin injection group (BIG) Botulinum Toxin A Injection - Prilocaine injection group (PIG) Prilocaine HCl % 2 injectable solution -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual analog scale, 4-point verbal rating scale, Pressure pain threshold Pre-treatment, 2nd and 6th week scores were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) between 0 and 10 was used to measure subjective complaints of pain (0 painless-10 worst pain).
4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) was also used to evaluate the affected area covering the TP (3 Severe pain; strong verbal response, accompanied by grimacing of face, withdrawal of hand, 2 Modarate pain, complaint reported spontaneously or mostly response to asking, accompanied by behavioral changes like grimacing, 1 Mild pain, pain is expressed when questioning without behavioral responces and 0 None, no pain).
An algometry device is used to evaluate "Pressure pain threshold" (PPT) and the sensitivity that the person felt is recorded in kg.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.