The Added Value of Contrast Enhancement for Guiding EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Masses
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 150
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods
研究概览
简要总结
A prospective study designed to show the superiority of contrast guided echoendoscopy versus conventional echoendoscopy
详细描述
A prospective study that compares the results using FNA contrast echoendoscopy versus standard FNA echoendoscopy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- Single (Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 86 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •solid pancreatic tumor lesions
排除标准
- •severe coagulopathy of trombocytopenia <50.000
- •patients refuse for biopsy prelevation or pacient's refuse to participate in the study
结局指标
主要结局
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods
时间窗: an average of 2 years
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods
次要结局
- Dysfunction in the two types of biopsies(day one)
- Comparison between standand endosonography and contrast enhanced endosonography in obtaining a superior quality in obtaining histology core(day one)
- Quality of histological specimen(histology core) obtained with the two types of FNA biopsies (contrast enhanced and standard)(5 days)
研究者
Professor Dr. Seicean Andrada
Principal Investigator Proffesor Dr Phd Md
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy