MedPath

The Passy Muir Swallowing Self Training Device

Completed
Conditions
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
Interventions
Device: Vibrotactile stimulation
Registration Number
NCT01765673
Lead Sponsor
James Madison University
Brief Summary

This is a device evaluation study to determine the optimal stimulation characteristics for using vibrotactile stimulation as a sensory triggering device for self retraining in patients with chronic moderate to severe dysphagia. Stimulation characteristics to be tested are frequency of vibration, pressure between the device and the skin, mode of vibration (pulsed or continuous).

Detailed Description

Participants were recruited who had chronic moderate to severe dysphagia following stroke or radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Their frequency of swallowing was transduced with an accelerometer placed on the skin over the thyroid cartilage and inductive plethysmography bands placed over the rib cage and abdomen. When laryngeal elevation coincided with respiratory apnea a swallow was marked. Five different motor frequencies were evaluated to determine their effect on participants frequency of swallowing (swallows per minute). Frequencies were 30, 70, 110, and 150 Hz and a combination of 70 and 110 Hz. For each vibratory frequency the number of swallows per minute occurring during stimulation was compared with sham when the participant was wearing the device but the motor was not turned on. The frequency fo swallowing during stimulation was compared with the frequency of swallowing between stimulations. Visual analogue ratings of the urge to swallow and discomfort were also measured after each condition. Other parameters were the pressure between the motor and the skin (0, 2, 4, and 6 kPa) and swallow initiation time when stimulation was on and when it was not. Swallowing frequency with continuous versus pulsed stimulation was also compared.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
13
Inclusion Criteria
  • Stroke or post radiation for the treatment of head and neck cancer
  • Dysphagia with a score of 2 or greater on the Penetration/Aspiration Scale OR a Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability ordinal risk rating of "probable" or "definite"
Exclusion Criteria
  • Neck injury
  • Epilepsy
  • Neurological disorder other than stroke
  • Psychiatric illness other than depression
  • Uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Inability to communicate secondary to significant speech or language problems
  • Inability to maintain alertness for 1 hour
  • Significant health concerns that would put the participant at risk

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Vibrotactile Stimulation in DysphagiaVibrotactile stimulationA Vibrotactile stimulation device will be evaluated in patients with chronic moderate to severe dysphagia for more than 6 months post onset due to stroke or following radiation treatment for head and neck cancer to assess which frequency, mode, pressure characteristics are most helpful in increasing the rate of swallowing, increasing the urge to swallow, assisting with the initiation of swallowing and not affecting discomfort.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Swallowing Frequency 70 & 110 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)

Change in Swallow Frequency 30 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)

Change in Swallow Frequency 150 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)

Change in Swallow Frequency 110 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)

Change in Swallow Frequency 70 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in VAS Urge to Swallow 110 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.

Percent Change in Swallow Frequency Pulse vs ContinuousDuring one session within one hour

Percent Change= \[(Number of swallows per minute from continuous stimulation -number of swallows per minute during pulsed stimulation) / number of swallows per minute during pulsed stimulation\] X 100

Change in Swallow Frequency 4 kPaDuring one session within 1 hour

The pressure between the neck band and the skin was set and the changes in swallowing frequency was compared between pressure between increased pressure and no pressure condition

Change in Swallow Frequency 6 kPaDuring one session within 1 hour

The pressure between the neck band and the skin was set and the changes in swallowing frequency was compared between increased pressure and no pressure condition

Change in Discomfort 150 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Discomfort 70 & 110 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Swallowing Frequency 2 kPaDuring one session within 1 hour

The pressure between the neck band and the skin was set and the changes in swallowing frequency was compared between pressure between increased pressure and no pressure condition

Change in Urge to Swallow 70 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.

Change in VAS Urge to Swallow 150 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.

Change in VAS Urge to Swallow 70 & 110 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Urge to Swallow After 30 Hz StimulationDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Discomfort Level 30 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Discomfort 70 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Discomfort 110 HzDuring one session within 1 hour

At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.

Change in Swallow Initiation TimeDuring one session within 1 hour

Change in swallow initiation time (ms) from swallow reaction time during vibrotactile stimulation minus reaction time with sham (no) stimulation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

James Madison University and Rockingham Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath