MedPath

Study to compare Nasopharyngeal versus Oropharyngeal Airway Device,which is better

Phase 4
Conditions
Health Condition 1: O030- Genital tract and pelvic infectionfollowing incomplete spontaneous abortion
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/06/054235
Lead Sponsor
DHANUSH ANAND
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1)Patients belonging to ASA1 & 2 posted for elective surgeries between age group 18-65 years.

2)Patients with BMI > 25kgm2 based on WHO criteria.

3)Patients posted for fractional currettage,Dilatational & currettage(D&C)/Medical termination of pregnancy(MTP),cervical encerclage,laproscopic sterilization and DJ stenting procedures

Exclusion Criteria

1)Nasal bone fractures & basilar bone fractures.

2)Paediatric age group, age less than 18years and not more than 65years.

3)Patients whose BMI less than 25kg/m2.

4)Patients belonging to ASA 3 ,4 and Emergency procedures.

5)Patient refusal.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of safety, efficacy and ease of insertion technique between two airway devices.Timepoint: 3minutes 6minutes 9minutes 12 minutes 15minutes 18minutes 21 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of requirement of oxygen in post operative period in groups under study. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 3minutes 6minutes 9minutes 12 minutes 15minutes 18minutes 21 minutes
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath