MedPath

Comparison of Performance of Two Different 3D Printed Definitive Resin Dental Crowns with Pressed Lithium Disilicate Dental Crowns in Patients

Phase 4
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth,
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/06/054161
Lead Sponsor
Dr Jyot Kaur Kohli
Brief Summary

·       Objectives:

1. To clinically evaluatethe performance of two 3D printed resin crowns as long-term definitiverestorations

·       2. Toclinically evaluate the performance of 3D printed resin crowns as compared topressed lithium disilicate crowns as long-term definitive restorations withrespect to anatomic form, restoration staining, marginal discoloration, colormatch, surface roughness, marginal adaptation, and periodontal status of theteeth

·       *Hypothesis:*There will be no differences between the 3D printed resin crowns and pressedlithium disilicate crowns in terms of longevity of the restorations.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria

a) Vital/Non-vital tooth in posterior segment b) Periodontally healthy with no signs of bone resorption or periapical pathology c) Tooth with adequate occluso-gingival height according to the principles of tooth preparation d) Complete complement of teeth in the opposing arch e) Capable of signing an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

a)Poor oral hygiene b)Clinical history of bruxism c)Crown or fixed partial denture on the opposing tooth d)Pregnant or lactating females.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Restorations will be evaluated at recall intervals of 3 months, 6 months and 9 months using Modified Ryge’s criteria for anatomical form, restoration staining, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, marginal adaptation and periodontal status. Comparison of proportion of success between groups will be done by chi-square test; p value less than 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.9 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Restorations will be evaluated at recall intervals of 3 months, 6 months and 9 months using Modified Ryge’s criteria for anatomical form, restoration staining, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, marginal adaptation and periodontal status3 months, 6 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad

🇮🇳

Dharwad, KARNATAKA, India

SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad
🇮🇳Dharwad, KARNATAKA, India
Dr Jyot Kaur Kohli
Principal investigator
9958216402
jyotkohli28@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.