MedPath

Head-to-head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007
Diagnostic Test: 68Ga-PSMA-11
Registration Number
NCT05079828
Lead Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to provide robust data on the head-to-head comparison of the two ligands of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) available in Switzerland for positron emission tomography (PET)-imaging, i.e. 68Ga-PSMA-11 und 18F-PSMA-1007.

Detailed Description

Prostate Cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Despite initial therapy at early stage disease, biochemical recurrence remains a commonly encountered entity and presents a challenge for conventional imaging modalities given their limited abilities to detect disease at early stages of recurrence.

PET/CT with ligands of the prostate specific membrane antigen has been shown to have a significant impact on treatment and is now the sine qua non for staging of recurrent PC. For example, accurate identification of PC lesions allows for more accurate radiotherapy planning, allowing for an individualised treatment strategy. There is therefore a substantial clinical requirement for the accurate identification and stratification of individuals in whom prostate cancer is diagnosed and at earlier stages of recurrent disease when the chance of a curative treatment is at its highest.

It is in this context that PSMA has become the focus of much attention owing to its high levels of expression on PC cells and has rapidly established itself as the investigation of choice in recurrent PC. Furthermore, PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is a rapidly evolving treatment modality for metastatic disease, creating an additional therapeutic role for PSMA-ligand molecular imaging, for which the term "theragnostics" has been coined. The challenge for nuclear medicine is therefore to develop tracers and examination protocols that provide optimal detection and characterisation of disease, thus improving upon this promising technique.

There are currently no published prospective head-to-head studies comparing these two tracers in recurrent PC. Because of this lack of data, there are no clear recommendations about which tracer to use and in which situation.

This study aims to fill this gap and provide comprehensive data with the potential to improve the diagnosis of PC. By providing robust data comparing the two tracers, such data will also provide guidance to clinicians faced with the scenario of an initially negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET as to the diagnostic utility of an additional 18F-PSMA-1007 PET, or vice-versa, and in which scenarios repeated scanning may be justified.

Finally, the application of the radiotracer into the same patient allows for a comparison of tracer kinetics. Although radiotracer kinetics are well known from the original pioneering dosimetric publications, they have never been compared in a head to head fashion and not in biochemical recurrence. Obtaining dynamic scans over the first hour post injection will allow intra-individual dosimetry and a head-to-head comparison of parametric imaging parameters, allowing a direct comparison of the radiotracer's affinity using standard parametric imaging techniques.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with known biochemical recurrence of a histologically confirmed prostate cancer post radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) values > 0.2 ng/ml:
  • Post prostatectomy: Patients > 18 y/o
  • PSA measured within ± 4 weeks of the first PSMA-PET/CT
  • Patients providing written informed consent
  • No change in PC treatment in the period between the first and second scans
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 6 months prior to the PSMA-PET/CT
  • Patients with contraindication to diuresis with 20mg Furosemide
  • Patients with renal dialysis or relevant renal impairment (eGFR < 35 ml/min)
  • Inability to provide written informed consent
  • Inability to schedule and attend two consecutive PET examinations
  • Patients undergoing active treatment for a second non-prostatic malignancy at the time of the first scan.
  • Known sensitivity or allergy to PSMA-ligands or one of the components of the radiotracer solutions used.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 218F-PSMA-1007Patients receive first a PET/CT with 18F-PSMA-1007 and a second with 68Ga-PSMA-11
Arm 268Ga-PSMA-11Patients receive first a PET/CT with 18F-PSMA-1007 and a second with 68Ga-PSMA-11
Arm 118F-PSMA-1007Patients receive first a PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and a second PET/CT with 18F-PSMA-1007
Arm 168Ga-PSMA-11Patients receive first a PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and a second PET/CT with 18F-PSMA-1007
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient-level detection rate3-6 months following final scan

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a pathological PSMA-positive finding (= patient-based sensitivity) at one time-point (2h) with the existing standard-of-care (68Ga-PSMA-11) compared to the new tracer (18F-PSMA-1007).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lesion based PPV12 months from the last scan

In a second round of tumour classification, two readers (in consensus) will classify each lesion as pathological, benign or uncertain in a lesion-specific approach and perform a lesion based follow-up to assess PPV on the lesion level.

Interreader reliabilityWithin 3-6 months of last scan

Readers shall independently classify all PSMA-avid lesions according to previously published diagnostic criteria. The frequency of benign, equivocal and pathological lesions will be noted. Lesions will additionally be classified by region (prostate bed (T), pelvic lymph nodes (N), extrapelvic lymph nodes (M1a), bone (M1b) or other organs (M1c)). The interreader reliability for these classifications will be compared between all readers.

Per region-based detection rateConfirmed by 12 months' follow up from date of scan to a composite standard

- The number of pathological, benign and uncertain lesions for each tracer in five regions (prostate bed, pelvic lymph nodes, extra-pelvic lymph nodes, bone, or other organs) classified by six blinded readers (three for each tracer) using previously published interpretation guidelines (PSMA-Rads 1.0)

Region based PPV12 months from the last scan

- The positive predictive value (PPV) stratified by region (local recurrence, lymph node, solid organ, bone) i.e. the percentage of pathological lesions that are confirmed pathological at the twelve months follow-up (based on the subset of patients and lesions with follow-up data at twelve months).

Lesion semiquantitative radiotracer uptakeWithin 6 months of scan date

- semiquantitative radiotracer uptake will be assessed by standardised uptake values (SUV) as well as tumour to background contrast in a lesion based analysis. The tumour to background ratio (TBR) is defined as lesion SUV ÷ SUV of reference background region, where the background uptake is defined by convention as the left gluteal musculature

Number of patients with adverse events and their severity48 hours

- Number and severity of adverse events per tracer (up to 48 hours follow up).

Comparison of tracer kineticsFor the first n=10 individuals, expected to be after 3 months

Intra-individual comparison of the parametric imaging parameter KD (measure of tracer affinity) for the two radiotracers.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern

🇨🇭

Bern, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath