MedPath

Comparison Between Two Techniques of Capsulotomy During Capsulorrhaphy in Cases of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Not Applicable
Conditions
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Interventions
Procedure: U shaped capsular incision during capsulorrhaphy
Procedure: T-shaped capsular incision diuring capsulorraphy
Registration Number
NCT06439147
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

comparison of the outcome between using U-shaped incision and T-shaped incision for capsulorrhaphy in management of Developmental dysplasia of the hip

Detailed Description

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a spectrum of abnormalities of the developing hip joint that ranges from shallowness of the acetabulum to capsular laxity and instability to frank dislocation . Developmental dysplasia of the hip is relatively common, occurring in 1 of 1000 live births.

When surgical intervention is decided, open reduction is needed to remove any obstacle that hinders hip reduction. Capsulorrhaphy is an essential step for minimizing instability of the hip after reduction The classic T-shaped capsular incision is done by two incisions: Vertical limb parallel to femoral neck axis and a transverse one parallel to the inguinal ligament resulting into two layers . Suturing them back is somewhat cumbersome after femoral head reduction. Therefore, the suggested technique utilizes a U-shaped incision to make re-suturing of the capsule easier with multiple stitches, and this study compares the outcome between using T-shaped incision and U-shaped incision for capsulorrhaphy after open reduction Femoral osteotomy or Pelvic osteotomy can be used in certain circumstances.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients older than 1 year and younger than 4 years
  • Unilateral or bilateral cases
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients younger than 1 year and older than 4 years old
  • Secondary hip dislocation ,neuromuscular disorders (as cerebral palsy, myelodysplasia or arthrogryposis).
  • Patients who will undergo femoral shortening.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
U-shaped groupU shaped capsular incision during capsulorrhaphyParticipants on which U shaped capsular incision will be used during capsulorrhaphy
T-shaped groupT-shaped capsular incision diuring capsulorraphyParticipants on which T shaped incision will be used during capsulorrhaphy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Modified Mackay's criteria as a clinical evaluation method1 year

Postoperative clinical evaluation Grade 1(Excellent):Painless,stable hip,no limp,more than 15 degrees of internal rotation Grade 2(Good):Painless,stable hip,slight limp or decreased motion;negative trendelenburg's sign Grade 3(Fair):Minimum pain,moderate stiffness;Positive trendelenburg sign Grade 4(Poor):Significant pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operative time ofcapsulorrhaphy1 year

calculate the time needed to close the capsule of the hip

Number of stitches taken during capsulorrhaphy1 year
any complication detected1 year

Recurrent dislocation,pain,Avascular necrosis of the hip

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Assiut university hospital

🇪🇬

Assiut, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath