To compare the correctness of 3D printed and conventionally prepared surgical guide in implantplacement in bilateral lower back teeth region
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- Partially edentulous mandibleOther specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/05/052587
- Lead Sponsor
- Jyoti Kutum
- Brief Summary
This study is a randomized controlled trial using a split-mouth design comparing the accuracyprovided by 3-D printed surgical guide and conventionally prepared surgical guide in implantplacement. The primary outcome measure will the amount of deviation of the final implant positionfrom the planned position.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
Inclusion Criteria
Individual with adequate bone height and width after extraction and extraction completed at least 3 months prior to implant placement and also should have antagonist teeth present.
Exclusion Criteria
Individual with metabolic and systemic disease, history of irradiation in head and neck region, current alcohol or drug abuse, pregnancy or lactating mother and poor oral hygiene.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of accuracy of implant placed with At 24 weeks 3D printed guide and conventional guide At 24 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare the difference in implant planning by conventional and digital method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
AIIMS New Delhi
🇮🇳West, DELHI, India
AIIMS New Delhi🇮🇳West, DELHI, IndiaJyoti KutumPrincipal investigator7637916558jackkutum@gmail.com