CTRI/2021/05/033658Not yet recruiting未知
A comparative study of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •All women with a specific indication for induction of labor, >34 weeks of gestation with an unfavorable cervix and reassuring fetal heart rate.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Women with multiple gestations, Malpresentation, Nonreactive fetal cardiac activity, Previous uterine surgeries, Cephalopelvic Disproportion, Placenta previa, Women with renal, or cardiovascular disease, severe asthma, glaucoma, Known hypersensitivity to prostaglandins, Parity 5 or more
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Comparison between the oral and vaginal Misoprostol effects on Pregnancy Termination in Secondpregnancy termination in Second Trimester.IRCT138706061106N1kashan university of medical sciences60
Recruiting
Phase 2
The Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with buccal and sublingual Misoprostol in Labor Induction in Term Pregnancyinduction of labour.IRCT20180121038465N1Qazvin University of Medical Sciences300
Recruiting
Phase 3
The effect of evening primrose in the treatment of missed abortion process.Missed abortion.Missed abortionO02.1IRCT20160308026971N8Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences140
Completed
Phase 3
Induction With Misoprostol: Oral Mucosa Versus Vaginal Epithelium (IMPROVE)PregnancyNCT02408315Indiana University300
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of misoprostol in Cervical ripeningoperative Hystroscopic Surgery.IRCT201204308588N6Tehran University of Medical Sciences.120