To compare buccal versus vaginal route of misoprostol for induction of labor.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/05/033658
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All women with a specific indication for induction of labor, >34 weeks of gestation with an unfavorable cervix and reassuring fetal heart rate.
Exclusion Criteria
Women with multiple gestations, Malpresentation, Nonreactive fetal cardiac activity, Previous uterine surgeries, Cephalopelvic Disproportion, Placenta previa, Women with renal, or cardiovascular disease, severe asthma, glaucoma, Known hypersensitivity to prostaglandins, Parity 5 or more
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the maternal and fetal outcome and drug efficacy between buccal and <br/ ><br>vaginal route of misoprostol administration in induction of labor.Timepoint: Baseline,4,8,12,16,20,24hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To assess the patient acceptability for each method.Timepoint: Using a questionnaire after the delivery process