Ureteric Stenting Versus Non-stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Ureter Stone
- Interventions
- Other: no stent
- Registration Number
- NCT04145063
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Jordan
- Brief Summary
This study aims to compare three groups of patients who underwent uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) to evaluate whether stents could be eliminated after the procedure
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
- Age 18 years or older
- unilateral ureteric stones managed by ureteroscopy
Exclusion Criteria
- Stone size < 2 cm
- bilateral ureteral stones
- incomplete stone removal due to impacted stones
- failed ureteroscopic access to the stone
- stone migration to the kidney
- pregnancy
- active urinary tract infection
- solitary kidney
- ureteral stent placed preoperatively
- severe mucosal injury or perforation
- suspected additional ureteral pathology such as ureteral stricture
- urothelial carcinoma or polyp.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy without US no stent Following uncomplicated uretroscopic lithotripsy no uretric stent will be placed
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Analog Score (VAS) 1 week Visual Analog Score (VAS) for flank pain and dysuria score, urgency, frequency, suprapubic pain, hematuria, analgesia requirement, operative time, re-hospitalization, and return to normal physical activity. This is a widely-used scale. It a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. It is administered as a straight horizontal line orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best) , where the patient indicates their situation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Jordan University Hospital
🇯🇴Amman, Jordan