Comparison of Efficacy of Topical Adapalene Gel Versus Cryotherapy in Recurrent Plantar Warts
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 98
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Efficacy of Treatment
研究概览
简要总结
This is a comparative study between two treatment options for skin viral infection.
详细描述
This is a comparative study between two treatment for viral infection in epidermal layer of skin that proliferates slowly forming thick, growths. This study will compare and evaluate the differences in efficacy between topical liquid nitrogen and topical retinoids.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients age limit 18-60 Years Patients with either gender (Male/Female) Patients with recurrent plantar warts
排除标准
- •Pregnancy/lactation. Pt on topical or systemic therapy in last 6 months. On immunosuppressants. > 5 lesions. Pts with local secondary infections.
研究组 & 干预措施
A
Treated with Topical adapalene gel 0.1%
干预措施: Topical Adapalene Gel 0.1% (Drug)
B
Treated with liquid nitrogen over affected parts
干预措施: Topical Liquid Nitrogen application (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Efficacy of Treatment
时间窗: 06 months
It will be defined through visual inspection by observing the complete clearance of the warts after 8 weeks administration of the treatment in both groups
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Saba Naz
DOCTOR
Khyber Teaching Hospital