Exploring the Relationship Between Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Training Load, and Exercise Performance
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Force plate assessment
- Conditions
- Heart Rate Variability
- Sponsor
- PepsiCo Global R&D
- Enrollment
- 49
- Locations
- 3
- Primary Endpoint
- Jump Height
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 11 days ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of the variation in time between each heartbeat.
It is an indirect and ubiquitous biomarker of performance readiness and recovery measured by most consumer-grade wearable fitness trackers. However, there is little documented on the relationship between HRV, training load, and performance measures in the Real-World.
Whoop wrist-worn activity trackers have been validated against the gold-standard Electrocardiography (ECG) for HRV and HR measurements. Whoop leverages photoplethysmography (PPG) technology to continuously track (HR, HRV, respiratory rate, energy expenditure) and provides, daily, individual insights, trends, and coaching to improve strain, sleep, and recovery. Research has demonstrated that heart rate variability (HRV) guided training may be more optimal compared to predetermined training for aerobic exercise improvements.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of providing personalized training recommendations based on HRV measured by a consumer-grade wearable (Whoop) in a real-world setting to better understand the HRV relationship with performance.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine if Training Intensity (%HRmax in min.) during Low HRV periods acutely (below HRV baseline next day and consecutive days) and chronically (weeks below previous weeks HRV baseline) will have a negative relationship with Post-Test Performance Metrics as measured by Force Plates, which could lead to personalized training recommendations using HRV. The Investigators conducted a pilot study using Whoop devices to monitor 50 subjects for 3 months and observed that individuals had High Training Load (above their baseline) on Low HRV days (below their baseline) on over 200 days. The Investigators hypothesize seeing similar High Training Load on Low HRV days during this study and would like to understand that relationship with Performance Primary objective: To determine if Training Intensity (%HRmax in min.) during Low HRV periods acutely (below HRV baseline next day and consecutive days) and chronically (weeks below previous weeks HRV baseline) will have a negative relationship with Post-Test Performance Metrics as measured by Force Plates. Secondary Objective : Measure and determine if subjective journal entries (mood, anxiety, recovery, etc.) are related to HRV, RHR, Sleep Quantity, and Sleep Efficiency.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Actively participating in resistance training 2-4 times per week.
- •Age 21-50 years, male and female.
- •Subject is willing to refrain from vigorous exercise (light physical activity only) 24 hours prior to visit(s).
- •Subject is willing to avoid alcohol consumption 24 hours prior to visit(s).
- •Subject is willing to provide consent.
- •Subject is able to continuously wear a wrist-worn device, including during sleep, except when submerged underwater (i.e., swimming, bathing).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Individual has a condition the Investigator believes would interfere with his ability to provide informed consent, comply with the project/study protocol, which might confound the interpretation of the project/study results or put the person at undue risk.
- •Those with a medical history that would interfere with the results of this study.
- •Under the care of a physician.
- •Skin sensitivities.
- •Sleep disorders.
- •Using prescription medications that would impact sleep.
- •If female, you are not pregnant, planning to get pregnant or currently breast feeding.
- •Not able to wear wrist-worn device continuously.
- •Lack of proficiency in English.
- •Lack of proficiency or access to the internet and email address.
Arms & Interventions
Single group
Healthy adults moderately trained in resistance exercises
Intervention: Force plate assessment
Single group
Healthy adults moderately trained in resistance exercises
Intervention: Whoop wrist band
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Jump Height
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Day1) to mid-study (Day 45) and end of study (Day 90)
(cm) using force plates
Dynamic Push Ups Peak Force
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Day 1) to mid-study (Day 45) and end of study (Day 90)
(N)) using force plates
Training Intensity
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Day 1) to mid-study (Day 45) and end of study (Day 90)
% HRmax (in minutes) measured by force plates
Peak Power Output
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Day 1) to mid-study (Day 45) and end of study (Day 90)
W/kg using force plates
Performance
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Day 1) to mid-study (Day 45) and end of study (Day 90)
Reactive Strength Index in cm/s using force plates
Secondary Outcomes
- Correlation of subjective measures to sleep quantity(Daily for 90 days)
- Correlation of subjective measures to sleep efficiency(Daily for 90 days)
- Correlation of subjective measures to Heart Rate Variability (HRV)(Daily for 90 days)
- Correlation of subjective measures to resting heart rate (RHR)(Daily for 90 days)