MedPath

PSMA-PET and MRI for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Treatment

Completed
Conditions
Prostatic Neoplasms
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: PSMA PET/CT
Diagnostic Test: PSMA PET/MR
Registration Number
NCT04298112
Lead Sponsor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Brief Summary

Approximately one third of prostate cancer patients experience biochemical relapse following initial radical prostatectomy or curative radiotherapy. To determine further treatment, it is of utmost importance to accurately differentiate local and regional recurrence from distant metastatic disease. Unfortunately, the currently used medical imaging methods (MRI and bone scan) lack sensitivity for detection of nodal and skeletal metastases, which can lead to over-treatment of patients with occult metastatic disease. PET imaging with prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligands has shown a promising potential for improving the detection accuracy in recurrent prostate cancer, especially when combined with the excellent soft-tissue contrast of MRI. However, evidence is mostly based on retrospective single center studies so far, including patients with a wide variety of PSA levels.

Improving the sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease is a crucial step in reducing over-treatment of prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The purpose of this prospective multi-center study is to standardize PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging across three university hospitals in Norway, and investigate its merit for detection of recurrent prostate cancer. The long-term overall goal is offering prostate cancer patients a more personalized treatment plan aiming to improve the chances of survival and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer
  • General contra-indications for an MRI exam (pacemaker, aneurysm clips, any form of metal in the body, or severe claustrophobia)
  • Serious concomitant systemic disorders or reduced cognitive functioning that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the patient's ability to complete the study or interfere with the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the study objectives
  • Impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Hormonal treatment during the last three months

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancerPSMA PET/MRprostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse following radical treatment, or patients with persistently elevated PSA levels after radical prostatectomy, that have been (or will be) referred to PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI at one of the participating hospitals.
relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancerPSMA PET/CTprostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse following radical treatment, or patients with persistently elevated PSA levels after radical prostatectomy, that have been (or will be) referred to PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI at one of the participating hospitals.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Detection rates of prostate cancer recurrence after radical treatment using a standardized imaging protocol consisting of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRbaseline

Consensus scoring and decision by nuclear medicine physician and radiologist on presence of local recurrent or metastatic lesions

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Differences in detection rates after radical treatment between whole-body PET/CT with and without PET/MRbaseline

Comparison of number of present local recurrent or metastatic lesions

Sensitivity and specificity of the standardized whole-body PET/CT and targeted PET/MR protocol for detection of recurrence based on long-term clinical follow-upbaseline images and long term follow-up

A reference standard based on evidence from histopathology, clinical follow-up and follow-up imaging will be established using criteria defining presence and absence of local recurrent and metastatic disease

Head to head comparison of uptake patterns of 68Ga- and 18F-PSMAbaseline

A selected subset of patients will be invited for a second imaging session.

Evaluation of locoregional PET-uptake according to primary radical treatmentbaseline

Comparison of locoregional PET-uptake in patients treated with primary radiotherapy versus primary prostatectomy

Number of equivocal findings with and without addition of PET/MR to the whole-body PET/CTbaseline

Comparison of the number of local recurrent and metastatic lesions scored as equivocal

Differences in detection rates between 68Ga- and 18F-PSMA tracersbaseline

Comparison of detection rates between the two radioisotopes based on consensus scoring

Detection rates of the combined PET/MR and PET/CT protocol compared with MRI-only.baseline

Comparison of detection rates using MRI only compared to the detection rates based on consensus decision using the combined PET/MR and PET/CT protocol

Detection rate dependency on prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and kinetics at time of imaging in addition to Gleason score and stage of primary cancerbaseline

Detection rates stratified according to PSA levels, kinetics and Gleason score

Inter-reader variability for interpretation of the PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRbaseline

Retrospective re-evaluation of images at minimum three sites

Detection of differences in image quality between participating centrabaseline

Image quality will be scored on a 5-point Likert Scale by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist and compared between the centra

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

University Hospital of North Norway

🇳🇴

Tromsø, Norway

Haukeland University Hospital

🇳🇴

Bergen, Norway

St Olavs Hospital

🇳🇴

Trondheim, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath