Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/07/069877
CTRI/2024/07/069877
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2

comparison of intra cervical foleys catheter with PGE2 gel for pre induction cervical ripening -prospective ranomized comparative study - NI

ot applicable0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsHealth Condition 1: O618- Other failed induction of labor

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: O618- Other failed induction of labor
Sponsor
ot applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •(a) Primigravida
  • •(b) \=37 weeks of gestation
  • •(c) Singleton pregnancy
  • •(d) Cephalic presentation
  • •(e) Bishops score \=3
  • •(f) Intact membrane
  • •(g)Indication of induction ( PIH , Post\-datism , oligohydroamnios, IUGR , OTHERS)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •(a) Multiple pregnancy
  • •(b) Mal\-presentation
  • •(c) Absent membranes
  • •(g) Medical disease like cardiac disease and renal disease

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Pre-induction ripening of the cervix using foleys catheter alone and combination of foleys and prostaglandin gelHealth Condition 1: null- pregnancy needing induction of labour
CTRI/2017/12/010737PGIMER110
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Foleys catheter with PGE2 and foleys catheter with misoprostol as a induction method for preterm fetusesHealth Condition 1: O94- Sequelae of complication of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium
CTRI/2023/06/054373Annie Jesline Dmello
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the effectiveness of cervical Foley Catheter without traction and Dilapan-S on induction of second trimester abortioSecond trimester abortion.
IRCT20210516051312N2Dezfoul University of Medical Sciences90
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
A comparative study between two methods of induction of labor pains, mechanical method (by insertion of Foley catheter) and chemical method ( by using dinoprostone gel) by inserting them in cervix of pregnant women .
CTRI/2021/07/035072VMMC and SAFDARJUNG HOSPITA
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Insertion of Foley catheter to uterine cervix versus oral misoprostol for preparation of uterine cervix for induction of labour in post dated pregnanciesEffects of Foley catheter versus oral misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening
SLCTR/2011/002niversity of Ruhuna150