Comparison of Constrained Induced Movement Therapy and Bimanual Intensive Movement Therapy on Functional Outcome of Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy, Congenital
- Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Enrollment
- 38
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Quality of upper extremity skills test
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the effects of constraint induced movement therapy CIMT and BIM bimanual activities on functional outcome in hemiplegic CP. Two randomized groups of patients with CP are treated with constrained arm for three hours on affected side and bimanual activities on BIM group respectively. Both, male and female patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be included. Patients having concurrent malignancy, infection, trauma or any bony deformity will be excluded.
Detailed Description
It is a Randomized control trial. Cerebral palsy children of age groups of 5 yrs to 12 years were included in the study with total sample size of thirty eight (38) with confidence interval of 95%. Simple random sampling was done by lottery method and data was collected from ALFARABI special school of education Islamabad. Two groups were formed and named as group A; CIMT with nineteen participants and group B, BIM bimanual training with nineteen participants respectively. The RCT compared the functional outcome of 3 hours constraining for 3 times a week for 6 weeks duration for CIMT group and five bimanual activities performed for three hours a day for bimanual group B and were assessed on the pretest and post test score evaluation of QUEST and JTHF test. All the participants were hemiplegic cp from both gender, fall on MAC system level II. Treatment for three hours was done on alternate days for 3 days a week. Five bimanual activites of holding a tray, cutting a fruit with knife, buttoning, cutting paper with scissor, and carry heavy objects with both hands are applied. Whereas the activities performed in CIMT are brushing teeth, holding spoon, fork combing hair and writing. Forty five children were screened before the evaluation and as a result 38 were enrolled in both groups having 19 in each group.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with age group of 5-12 years. Patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy of both genders. Patients who have active wrist extension, active PIP -MCP joint extension and active thumb extension.
- •Patients who have mild spasticity on spasticity rating scale of QUEST test Patients who fall on level II on MAC System are included Patients who has cognitive dysfunction ( screening by WISC Wechsler Intelligence test for children) all have score above 80.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who can develop any sort of behavior problems Patients who does not co-operate with therapist in CIMT procedure Any structural deformity. Any surgical intervention that requires patient to be immobile.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Quality of upper extremity skills test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Quality of upper extremity skills test or QOL quality of life. This scoring includes dissociated movements, grasps, weight bearing and protected extension. This scoring helps the therapist to determine which functional limitations needs to be addressed for better flexion extension abduction and other related movements to improve quality of life . It includes 36 items to be tested and thirty to forty minutes to apply and assess the test.
JEBSEN Hand Function Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The JEBSEN Hand Function Test was designed to provide a comprehensive, objective test of hand function for actions of daily living. It has 7 items and takes approximately 15-45 minutes to administer. 7 items include: writing, turning over 3-by-5 inch cards, picking up small common objects, stacking checkers, simulated feeding, picking up large light objects and picking up large heavy objects. The results are calculated by timing the time taken to complete each task. The tests are always presented in the same order and are performed with the non-dominant hand first
Secondary Outcomes
- Manual ability classification(6 weeks)