Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05049564
NCT05049564
Completed
Not Applicable

A Randomized Controlled Study of Microsurgical Clipping Via Keyhole Approaches Versus Traditional Open Approaches and Endovascular Coiling for Ruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms

ZhuQing0 sites150 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor
ZhuQing
Enrollment
150
Primary Endpoint
occlusion rate of aneurysm
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Endovascular coiling has become a strategy of choice of intracranial aneurysms due to its minimally invasiveness. However, there has few prospective randomized controlled studies on the comparison of therapeutic effect between endovascular coiling and microsurgical clipping, especially the latter via keyhole approaches, which has been widely used in recent years. Based on the data of a single center, a randomized controlled study was conducted on patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms suitable for both endovascular and extravascular treatment, including endovascular coiling, microsurgical clipping via conventional craniotomy and keyhole approaches, in order to compare the efficacy of the above strategies and provide more objective basis for treatment selection for operators.

Detailed Description

Consecutive patients of a single center will be screened. If spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is confirmed by head computed tomography (CT), a diagnostic CT angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) will be carried out emergently. A patients harbored a single intracranial aneurysm of anterior circulation that resulted in SAH will be concerned. Based on the assessment of condition, the patient will enrolled into this study without indication of decompressive craniectomy. The enrolled patients will be divided randomly into 3 groups, who experienced endovascular coiling, microsurgical clipping via conventional craniotomy and via keyhole approaches. All of these treatment will be conducted by a same senior neurosurgeon. CTA or DSA were followed up regularly. The occlusion rate, operative period, hospitalization duration and cost, surgical complications were compared and analyzed.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2013
End Date
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
ZhuQing
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

ZhuQing

Chief Neurosurgeon

Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Single intracranial anterior circulation aneurysm diagnosed by CTA or DSA
  • CT showed that subarachnoid hemorrhage originated from the rupture of the aneurysm and was confirmed during operation
  • No indication of decompressive craniectomy (Hunt-Hess grade ≤ 4, Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 7, no brain herniation; CT showed midline displacement \< 5mm)
  • The aneurysm is suitable for both endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping

Exclusion Criteria

  • The patients and their families did not agree to join the study
  • Patients with unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms
  • Patients with posterior circulation aneurysms
  • Patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms
  • Those who cannot receive treatment due to serious concomitant diseases

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

occlusion rate of aneurysm

Time Frame: an average of 1 month

occlusion rate of aneurysm

operative time

Time Frame: an average of 1 month

total operative duration

hospitalization time

Time Frame: up to 3 months after discharge

hospitalization duration

hospitalization cost

Time Frame: up to 3 months after discharge

cost during hospitalization

postoperative complication rate

Time Frame: up to 3 months after discharge

complication rate after intervention

Secondary Outcomes

  • recurrent rate of aneurysm(6 months after treatment)
  • long-term complication rate(6 months after treatment)

Similar Trials