Percutaneous Nephrostomy Versus Stent In Sepsis Trial
- Conditions
- Ureteric CalculusSepsisHydronephrosis
- Registration Number
- NCT02929160
- Lead Sponsor
- The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating The National Children's Hospital
- Brief Summary
Randomized control trial to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrostomy with retrograde ureteric stenting for emergency renal decompression in cases of obstruction and sepsis associated with ureteric calculi.
- Detailed Description
The obstructed kidney in the setting of urosepsis is a urological emergency. Stone manipulation in the setting of active, untreated infection with concomitant urinary tract obstruction can lead to life-threatening sepsis. Therefore, urgent decompression of the collecting system is warranted.
There are two options for urgent decompression of an obstructed collecting system:
1. Image-guided percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement
2. Cystoscopic retrograde placement of a ureteric stent
This strategy allows drainage of infected urine and penetration of antibiotics to the affected renal unit. Definitive stone manipulation should be delayed until the infection is cleared following an appropriate course of antimicrobial therapy.
Both the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) provide guidelines for management of an obstructed kidney. Both organisations provide evidence-based statements of the highest recommendation that urgent decompression of the kidney is mandated in the setting of sepsis. However, neither organisation recommend one decompression modality over the other. There is a lack of high quality up-to-date evidence to support a consensus view that one method of decompression is superior to the other.
This study aims to determine the most effective method of renal decompression in cases of obstruction and sepsis associated with ureteric calculi.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- Ureteric calculus with proximal hydronephrosis confirmed on CT KUB
- White cell count >12,000mm3 and/or temperature >38C
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Urethral or ureteric stricture disease
- Urinary diversion
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to normalisation of white cell count and/or temperature Within 1 week
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Length of hospital stay Within 1 week
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating The National Children's Hospital
🇮🇪Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
St. James's Hospital
🇮🇪Dublin, Ireland
The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating The National Children's Hospital🇮🇪Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland